ImmerVision, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Summary
ImmerVision sues Apple for allegedly infringing its patent technology in Apple's imaging products.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage vs realityNo signal
Coverage events: 2P · 2D · 3N (7 articles)
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
2 plaintiff-favorable · 2 defendant-favorable · 3 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 2 plaintiff · 2 defendant · 3 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
Plaintiff-favorable
Defendant-favorable
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
For the plaintiff
- Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLPDennis James Butler, John David Simmons, Keith Aaron Jones
- Independent counselKeith A. Jones
For the defendant
- Independent counselDoug Winnard, Jennifer M Hartjes, Karina N. Pundeff +3 more
- Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLPBindu Ann George Palapura, David Ellis Moore
- Potter Anderson & Corroon LLPBrandon Ryan Harper
- Court
- DED
- Docket no.
- 1:21-cv-01570
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2021-11-03
- Last filing
- 2026-03-10
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement