Is the press coverage of Gray v. Paramount Global aligned with the court record?

Coverage leans toward the defendant. No classified ruling yet to compare against the court record.

Gray v. Paramount Global

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Gray sues Paramount Global for copyright infringement over allegedly copied creative work.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Deep summary (AI brief of the complaint)

**Plaintiff:** Shaun Gray, individual screenwriter and visual effects artist, resident of Ulster County, New York. **Defendant:** Paramount Global, Paramount Pictures Corporation, and Paramount Streaming Services Inc. (all Delaware corporations); plus Does 1–10. **Core allegation:** Gray co-wrote key action sequences in the *Top Gun: Maverick* screenplay between June and November 2017 without a work-for-hire agreement or assignment, making him a joint author and joint copyright owner of the screenplay and film. Paramount released and exploited the film—grossing among the highest box-office totals of all time—without crediting Gray, compensating him, or accounting to him for his pro-rata share of profits. **Asserted IP:** - Copyright in the *Top Gun: Maverick* screenplay (joint work, 17 U.S.C. § 101) - Copyright in the *Top Gun: Maverick* film (theatrical release May 27, 2022) - Gray's independently authored scenes ("Gray Scenes"), including the hypersonic prototype sequence, the Maverick-vs.-trainees dogfight, the mission briefing, the nuclear-facility bombing run, the…

AI-generated from the filed complaint. Always verify against the original document.

Coverage vs realityPress: defendant

Coverage events: 1P · 3D · 5N (11 articles)

Press coverage leans defendant-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

1 plaintiff-favorable · 5 defendant-favorable · 5 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 1 plaintiff · 3 defendant · 5 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable

Paramount Sues ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ Writer’s Cousin, Who Claimed He Authored Key Action ScenesThe Hollywood Reporter · 2025-08-14

Defendant-favorable

‘Top Gun: Maverick’ Writer’s Cousin Loses Lawsuit Against Paramount Claiming He Wrote Key ScenesVariety · 2026-01-09
Paramount defeats writer's copyright lawsuit over 'Top Gun: Maverick'Reuters · 2026-01-09
Paramount Gets Early Win In 'Top Gun' DisputeLaw360 · 2026-01-09
'Top Gun: Maverick' writer not entitled to share of movie profits, US judge saysReuters · 2025-07-31

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff

Toberoff & AssociatesMarc Toberoff
Independent counselJaymie Parkkinen

For the defendant

O'Melveny & Myers LLPDanielle Feuer, Molly Manning Lens, Samuel Donohue
Kirkland & Ellis LLPMatthew Kaiser

Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Docket no.: 1:25-cv-03484
Nature of suit: Copyright
Filed: 2025-04-27
Last filing: 2026-03-11

Cause

17:501 Copyright Infringement

Entities in this case

Paramount8 Gray

Parties

Shaun Gray (plaintiff) Does (defendant) Paramount Streaming Services Inc. (defendant) Paramount Pictures Corporation (defendant) Paramount Global (defendant) Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. (miscellaneous)

Docket entries

2026-03-11
Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Appeal
2026-01-15
Telephone Conference
2026-01-15
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Joint Telephone Conference held on 1/15/2026. No transcript nor recording was made.. Parties notified the Court that the pre-existing conflict during the scheduled dates for trial no longer poses an issue. (Kotowski, Linda)
2025-12-23
1 - Terminate Hearings AND Oral Argument AND ~Util - Set Hearings
2025-12-05
Telephone Conference
2025-10-27
Telephone Conference
2025-10-24
~Util - Set Hearings
2025-10-15
Oral Argument
2025-10-03
Telephone Conference
2025-09-22
Telephone Conference
2025-09-11
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: ( Oral Argument set for 10/14/2025 at 03:00 PM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff in courtroom 14B of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York City, N.Y..). (Kotowski, Linda)
2025-09-02
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Sealed Telephone Hearing held on 9/2/2025. (Kotowski, Linda)
2025-08-29
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: Sealed evidentiary telephonic hearing regarding Plaintiff's in camera document will take place on Tuesday, September 2 at 11:00 a.m. EST. (Kotowski, Linda)
2025-08-21
Oral Argument
2025-08-07
Telephone Conference AND ~Util - Set Hearings
2025-08-06
Telephone Conference
2025-08-04
1 - Terminate Hearings AND ~Util - Set Hearings
2025-08-01
No description on file
2025-06-09
Telephone Conference
2025-06-03
Telephone Conference
2025-05-09
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff:. Telephone Conference set for 5/9/2025 at 03:00 PM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff. The public and parties may access this proceeding by dialing: USA toll free 855-244-8681, Access code 2317 432 3257. (Kotowski, Linda)
2025-04-28
Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice
2025-04-28
Case Designation

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on X LinkedIn

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-04-09

Summary