Oracle USA, Inc. v. Rimini Street, Inc.

Summary

Oracle sues Rimini Street for copyright infringement related to Oracle software and services.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Entities in this case

Parties

ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (plaintiff) ORACLE AMERICA, INC. (plaintiff) ORACLE USA, INC. (plaintiff) RIMINI STREET, INC. (defendant)

Docket entries

1. #672023-10-31

   Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, PATRICK J. BUMATAY and RICHARD D. BENNETT) On October 26, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a motion to transfer consideration of attorney fees on appeal to the district court pursuant to Circuit Rule 39-1.8. Dkt. No. [66]. Plaintiffs also affirm that this motion is unopposed by Defendant. Id. Accordingly, this motion is GRANTED. Consideration of Plaintiffs’ attorney fees on appeal is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [12817525] (OC) [Entered: 10/31/2023 10:12 AM]

2. #662023-10-26

   Filed (ECF) Appellees Oracle USA, Inc., Oracle International Corporation and Oracle America, Inc. Motion for miscellaneous relief [to Transfer Consideration of Attorneys' Fees on Appeal to the District Court]. Date of service: 10/26/2023. [12816087] [22-15188] (Kummer, Raechel) [Entered: 10/26/2023 05:51 PM]

3. #652023-10-20

   MANDATE ISSUED.(JSB, PJB and RDB) [12812811] (BJK) [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:19 AM]

4. #642023-10-12

   Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE, PATRICK J. BUMATAY and RICHARD D. BENNETT) Judges Bumatay, Bybee, and Bennett have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing (Dkt. No. [63]). Judge Bumatay has also voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Bybee and Bennett have so recommended. Fed. R. App. P. 40. The full court has been advised of the petition, and no judge has requested to vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. 35. Therefore, the petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (Dkt. No. [63]) are DENIED. [12808496] (OC) [Entered: 10/12/2023 09:51 AM]

5. #632023-09-06

   Filed (ECF) Appellant Rimini Street, Inc. petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (from 08/24/2023 opinion). Date of service: 09/06/2023. [12787724] [22-15188] (Evanson, Blaine) [Entered: 09/06/2023 04:33 PM]

6. #622023-08-24

   Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): At the direction of the Court, the parties shall bear their own costs. [12780082] (MM) [Entered: 08/24/2023 09:05 AM]

7. #612023-08-24

   FILED OPINION (JAY S. BYBEE, PATRICK J. BUMATAY and RICHARD D. BENNETT) The contempt findings for Issues 1–4 are AFFIRMED. The contempt finding for Issue 8 is REVERSED. The district court’s order regarding Issues 7 and 9 is VACATED to the extent it enjoins de minimis copying not prohibited by the Copyright Act. The imposition of sanctions is VACATED and REMANDED for recalculation consistent with this opinion. Judge: PJB Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12780080] (MM) [Entered: 08/24/2023 09:02 AM]

8. #602023-08-11

   Filed (ECF) Appellant Rimini Street, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 08/11/2023. [12772465] [22-15188] (Evanson, Blaine) [Entered: 08/11/2023 09:27 AM]

9. #592023-08-09

   Filed (ECF) Appellees Oracle America, Inc., Oracle International Corporation and Oracle USA, Inc. Correspondence: exhibits in support of citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 08/09/2023 [12771553] [22-15188] (Kummer, Raechel) [Entered: 08/09/2023 04:38 PM]

10. #582023-08-09

    Filed (ECF) Appellees Oracle America, Inc., Oracle International Corporation and Oracle USA, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 08/09/2023. [12771419] [22-15188] (Kummer, Raechel) [Entered: 08/09/2023 03:02 PM]

11. #572023-02-06

    ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO JAY S. BYBEE, PATRICK J. BUMATAY and RICHARD D. BENNETT. The audio and video recordings of this hearing are available on our website at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [12647066] (WWP) [Entered: 02/06/2023 01:51 PM]

12. #562022-11-28

    Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Raechel Kummer for Appellees Oracle America, Inc., Oracle International Corporation and Oracle USA, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco on 02/06/2023 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1, 3rd Floor, Room 338). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 11/28/2022. [12596249] [22-15188] (Kummer, Raechel) [Entered: 11/28/2022 08:43 AM]

13. #552022-11-28

    Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Mark Andrew Perry for Appellant Rimini Street, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco on 02/06/2023 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 11/28/2022. [12596215] [22-15188] (Perry, Mark) [Entered: 11/28/2022 07:50 AM]

14. #542022-11-27

    Notice of Oral Argument on Monday, February 6, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA.The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location.View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here.NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Anyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available here. At this time, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance.Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so.Be sure to review the GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible).If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Monday, February 6, 2023. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12596098]. [22-15188] (KS) [Entered: 11/27/2022 06:10 AM]

15. #532022-10-20

    Filed (ECF) Attorney Raechel Kummer for Appellees Oracle America, Inc., Oracle International Corporation and Oracle USA, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 10/20/2022. [12568986] [22-15188] (Kummer, Raechel) [Entered: 10/20/2022 01:28 PM]

16. #522022-10-20

    Added Attorney(s) Raechel Kummer for party(s) Appellee Oracle USA, Inc. Appellee Oracle International Corporation Appellee Oracle America, Inc., in case 22-15188. [12568944] (NAC) [Entered: 10/20/2022 01:01 PM]

17. #512022-10-20

    Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Raechel Keay Kummer (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 1111 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20004) for Appellees Oracle America, Inc., Oracle International Corporation and Oracle USA, Inc.. Date of service: 10/20/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12568934] [22-15188] (Kummer, Raechel) [Entered: 10/20/2022 12:53 PM]

18. #502022-10-20

    Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Mark Andrew Perry for Appellant Rimini Street, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 10/20/2022. [12568806] [22-15188] (Perry, Mark) [Entered: 10/20/2022 11:46 AM]

19. #492022-10-19

    This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San FranciscoPlease review the San Francisco sitting dates for February 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions carefully.When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date.If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice, using CM/ECF (Type of Document: Correspondence to Court; Subject: request for mediation).[12568221]. [22-15188] (KS) [Entered: 10/19/2022 04:31 PM]

20. #482022-08-08

    Received 3 paper copies of further excerpts of record [45] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Rimini Street, Inc.. [12512008] (SD) [Entered: 08/08/2022 01:35 PM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.