Jennifer Sendzul v. Jay Hoag

Summary

Jennifer Sendzul sues Jay Hoag and others over copyright infringement involving film distribution and production rights.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Entities in this case

Parties

JENNIFER L.M. SENDZUL (plaintiff) VIRGINIA MADSEN, an individual (defendant) BROOKE C. SHIELDS, an individual (defendant) DARYL HANNAH, an individual (defendant) KATHY GRIFFIN, an individual (defendant) AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (defendant) AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation (defendant) VERTICAL ENTERTAINMENT LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (defendant) NETFLIX STREAMING SERVICES INC., a Delaware Corporation (defendant) NETFLIX INC., a Delaware corporation (defendant) NINA HENDERSON MOORE, an individual (defendant) BRADFORD S. HENNIG, an individual (defendant) LAURIE K. LACOB, an individual (defendant) MICHAELA HOAG, an individual (defendant) KNIGHTS CAPITAL 111 LLC, a California Limited Liability Company (defendant) JAY C. HOAG, an individual (defendant)

Docket entries

1. #252023-04-05

   Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MD): Appellee Kathy Griffin’s motion (Docket Entry No. [22]) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The extension applies to all appellees. The answering briefs are due May 3, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the last-served answering brief. The streamlined request (Docket Entry No. 24) of appellees Amazon Digital Services LLC, et al., for an extension of time to file the answering brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. In light of the multiple extensions previously granted for the answering brief, any further requests for an extension of time by any appellee must be made by written motion. [12689875] (OC) [Entered: 04/05/2023 03:06 PM]

2. #242023-03-31

   Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees Amazon Digital Services LLC, AMZN, Jay C. Hoag, Michaela Hoag, Laurie K. Lacob, Nina Henderson Moore, Netflix Inc. and Netflix Streaming Services Inc.. New requested due date is 05/02/2023. [12686689] [22-55508] (Freeman, Cydney) [Entered: 03/31/2023 02:07 PM]

3. #232023-03-28

   Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Jennifer L.M. Sendzul Response supporting motion ([22] Motion (ECF Filing), [22] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to extend time to file brief). Date of service: 03/28/2023. [12683217] [22-55508] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 04/05/2023 by TYL] (Sendzul, Jennifer) [Entered: 03/28/2023 08:56 AM]

4. #222023-03-27

   Filed (ECF) Appellee Kathy Griffin Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 05/03/2023. Date of service: 03/27/2023. [12683009] [22-55508] (Miller, Jeffry) [Entered: 03/27/2023 05:06 PM]

5. #212023-02-10

   Streamlined request [20] by Appellee Kathy Griffin to extend time to file the brief is approved FOR ALL APPELLEES. Amended briefing schedule: Appellees Amazon Digital Services LLC, Daryl Hannah, Bradford S. Hennig, Knights Capital 111 LLC, Virginia Madsen, Vertical Entertainment LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Kathy Griffin, Jay C. Hoag, Michaela Hoag, Laurie K. Lacob, Nina Henderson Moore, Netflix Inc., Netflix Streaming Services Inc. and Brooke C. Shields answering brief due 04/03/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12651245] (DLM) [Entered: 02/10/2023 04:57 PM]

6. #202023-02-10

   Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Kathy Griffin. New requested due date is 04/03/2023. [12651237] [22-55508] (Miller, Jeffry) [Entered: 02/10/2023 04:53 PM]

7. #192023-01-27

   Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellant’s motion (included in Docket Entry No. [18]) to waive the paper copies requirement for the opening brief is granted. The answering briefs remain due March 3, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the last-served answering brief. [12640466] (AF) [Entered: 01/27/2023 10:30 AM]

8. #182023-01-25

   Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Jennifer L.M. Sendzul response to Court order dated 01/23/2023. Date of service: 01/25/2023. [12637949] [22-55508] (Sendzul, Jennifer) [Entered: 01/25/2023 09:20 AM]

9. #172023-01-23

   Filed clerk order: The opening brief [11] submitted by Mrs. Jennifer L.M. Sendzul is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12635523] (LA) [Entered: 01/23/2023 08:56 AM]

10. #162023-01-20

    Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, RICHARD A. PAEZ and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN): The opening brief received on August 25, 2022, and the responses to the July 25, 2022 order to show cause demonstrate that this appeal involves non-frivolous issues. We construe this appeal to encompass both orders issued by the district court on May 9, 2022. The order to show cause is discharged, and appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [13]) is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect appellant’s in forma pauperis status. The Clerk will file the opening brief received on August 25, 2022 (Docket Entry No. [11]). The answering briefs are due March 3, 2023; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the last-served answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellee[s] “must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief.” Id. [12635315] (AF) [Entered: 01/20/2023 04:45 PM]

11. #152022-10-14

    Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Jennifer L.M. Sendzul reply to response to Court order dated 10/19/2022. Date of service: 10/14/2022. [12563447] [22-55508] (Sendzul, Jennifer) [Entered: 10/14/2022 10:59 AM]

12. #142022-10-10

    Filed (ECF) Appellee Kathy Griffin reply to response (). Date of service: 10/10/2022. [12559147] [22-55508] (Miller, Jeffry) [Entered: 10/10/2022 03:29 PM]

13. #132022-09-29

    Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Jennifer L.M. Sendzul response to Court order dated 09/12/2022. Date of service: 09/29/2022. [12552147] [22-55508] (Sendzul, Jennifer) [Entered: 09/29/2022 09:42 AM]

14. #122022-09-12

    Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellant’s motion to vacate this court’s July 25, 2022 order is denied [10]. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A), (4)(B). Within 21 days of this order, appellant must comply with the July 25, 2022 order by: (1) filing in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) paying to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND filing in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not submit a separate statement that the appeal should go forward, the court will treat appellant’s opening brief as a statement that the appeal should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will send a copy of the July 25, 2022 order and attachments to appellant along with this order. (Pro Se) [12538170] (CKP) [Entered: 09/12/2022 01:05 PM]

15. #112022-08-25

    Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mrs. Jennifer L.M. Sendzul. Date of service: 08/25/2022. [12526244] [22-55508] (Sendzul, Jennifer) [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:43 AM]

16. #102022-07-28

    Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Jennifer L.M. Sendzul Motion for miscellaneous relief [motion to set aside revocation of IFP]. Date of service: 07/28/2022. [12504102] [22-55508] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 07/28/2022 by TYL] (Sendzul, Jennifer) [Entered: 07/28/2022 10:57 AM]

17. #92022-07-25

    Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district court’s docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has revoked appellant’s in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellant’s statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12501300] (CKP) [Entered: 07/25/2022 12:35 PM]

18. #82022-07-22

    Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/22/2022. Certification re Frivolous Appeal. [12500465] (QDL) [Entered: 07/22/2022 04:06 PM]

19. #72022-07-19

    Added Attorney(s) Jeffry A. Miller for party(s) Appellee Kathy Griffin, in case 22-55508. [12497240] (DJV) [Entered: 07/19/2022 11:44 AM]

20. #62022-07-19

    Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jeffry A. Miller (Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP 550 West C Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, CA 92101) for Appellee Kathy Griffin. Date of service: 07/19/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12497225] [22-55508] (Miller, Jeffry) [Entered: 07/19/2022 11:36 AM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.