EireOg Innovations Ltd. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Summary
EireOg Innovations sues Cisco, IBM, Palo Alto Networks, and Fortinet for patent infringement.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage: 5P · 2D · 21N
Latest ruling: defendant (2024-04-08)
Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the headlines behind the meter
5 plaintiff-favorable · 2 defendant-favorable · 21 neutral
- Patent Owner Looks To Undo Verdict Clearing CiscoLaw360 · 2026-06-02
- Patent Owner Looks To Undo Verdict Clearing CiscoLaw360 · 2026-06-02
- Patent Owner Looks To Undo Verdict Clearing CiscoLaw360 · 2026-06-02
- Jury Ordered Cisco to Pay $65.7M in Patent Infringement LawsuitExlitem · 2024-11-01
- Texas Jury Clears Cisco Of Chip Infringement ClaimsLaw360 · 2026-04-27
- Cisco Seeks Ruling That It Never Infringed Chip PatentsLaw360 · 2026-04-10
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPMadeleine C Laupheimer, Sharchun Dennis Wang, Steven Horn
- Gillam & Smith, LLPMelissa Richards Smith
- Desmarais LLP - New YorkTamir Packin
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP - BostonSarah R. Frazier
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP - DenverMary (Mindy) V Sooter
- Desmarais LLP - San FranciscoGabrielle Elizabeth Higgins, Peter C Magic
- Desmarais LLPBetty Hong Chen, Michael Paul Roesler
- Duane Morris LLPBrianna M. Vinci, Richard Hughes
- Duane Morris LLP - AtlantaAlice E Snedeker, David C Dotson
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPChristopher Scott Ponder, Sujung Hahn
- Independent counselMatthew Christopher Gaudet
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter, & Hampton LLPJeffrey Liang
- Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPHarper S Batts
- Court
- TXED
- Docket no.
- 2:24-cv-00224
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- Robert W. Schroeder, III
- Filed
- 2024-04-03
- Last filing
- 2026-07-10
Cause
35:145 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
International Business Machines Corporation Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Fortinet, Inc. Cisco Systems Inc. EireOg Innovations Ltd. Jane Du Scott Woloson Kent Stevens
Docket entries
- 2026-06-26
No description on file
- 2026-06-26
No description on file
- 2026-06-26
No description on file
- 2026-05-19
No description on file
- 2026-04-07
No description on file
- 2026-04-02
No description on file
- 2026-02-03
NOTICE that the Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/5/2026 at 01:30 PM is CANCELED and will be reset to a future date. (wea)
- 2026-01-26
No description on file
- 2026-01-26
NOTICE of Hearing: Final Pretrial Conference RESET for 2/5/2026 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. **TIME CHANGE ONLY**(wea)
- 2026-01-13
No description on file
- 2026-01-13
NOTICE of Hearing: Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/5/2026 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (wea)
- 2025-10-06
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 149 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION to Compel Technical Documentation and Source Code from Defendant International Business Machines Corporation, 148 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION to Compel Technical Documentation and Source Code from Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. : Motion Hearing reset for 10/8/2025 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. **TIME CHANGE ONLY**(wea)
- 2025-09-17
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 149 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION to Compel Technical Documentation and Source Code from Defendant International Business Machines Corporation : Motion Hearing set for 10/8/2025 at 03:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (wea) Modified on 9/17/2025 to correct hearing time. (wea).
- 2025-04-22
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 91 SEALED MOTION EIREOGS AUGUST 23, 2023 VALUATION OF THE ASSERTED PATENTS: Motion Hearing set for 5/22/2025 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (wea)
- 2024-06-18
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)
- 2024-06-10
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)
- 2024-06-10
No description on file
- 2024-05-29
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap (Lead 2:24-cv-224 and Members 2:24-cv-225, 2:24-cv-226 and 2:24-cv-227): Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference held on 5/29/2024. Counsel for the parties appeared. Court asked whether the parties consented to trial before the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Court proceeded to provide counsel Claim Construction and Jury Selection/Trial dates. (Court Reporter Shelly Holmes) (aeb)
- 2024-04-08
No description on file
- 2024-04-08
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cisco Systems Inc. to 6/9/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(NKL)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.