Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Google LLC

Summary

Network-1 Technologies sues Google and YouTube for allegedly infringing its patents.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityPress: plaintiff

Coverage events: 2P · 0D · 9N (18 articles)

Latest ruling: neutral (2025-04-17)

Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

5 plaintiff-favorable · 0 defendant-favorable · 13 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 2 plaintiff · 0 defendant · 9 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2025-08-04 · coverage 0P / 0D / 3N2025-09-08 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1N2025-09-15 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1N2025-11-17 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1N2026-03-16 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1N2026-04-20 · coverage 2P / 0D / 1N2026-04-27 · coverage 3P / 0D / 0N2026-05-04 · coverage 0P / 0D / 2N2026-05-11 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1N2026-07-06 · coverage 0P / 0D / 2NDocketFiled 2024-06-032025-04-17 · ruling · favors neutral ORDER filed granting the motions to the extent that ECF No. 33 is stricken and ECF No. 4…Jun 24Jun 25Jul 26filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Docket no.
24-1893
Nature of suit
Patent
Filed
2024-06-03
Last filing
2026-04-23

Entities in this case

Parties

YOUTUBE, LLC GOOGLE LLC NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Docket entries

  1. #702026-04-23

    No description on file

  2. #692026-04-23

    No description on file

  3. #642026-02-04

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellees Google LLC and YouTube, LLC. Service: 02/04/2026 by email. [1145189] [24-1893] [Andrew Trask] [Entered: 02/04/2026 08:06 PM]

  4. #632026-02-04

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Network-1 Technologies, Inc.. Service: 02/04/2026 by email. [1145152] [24-1893] [Brian Ledahl] [Entered: 02/04/2026 04:58 PM]

  5. #622026-01-21

    NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2603K. Case scheduled March 9, 2026. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 02/04/2026. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1141926] [KMK] [Entered: 01/21/2026 12:46 PM]

  6. #612025-12-22

    The following conflict dates submitted by Andrew V. Trask for YouTube, LLC and Google LLC have been accepted by the court: 02/02/2026, 02/03/2026, 02/04/2026, 02/05/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/09/2026. [1136045] [MJL] [Entered: 12/22/2025 11:01 AM]

  7. #602025-12-16

    Notice from Appellees Google LLC and YouTube, LLC regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 12/16/2025 by email. [1135159] [24-1893] [Andrew Trask] [Entered: 12/16/2025 09:01 PM]

  8. #592025-12-04

    The following conflict dates submitted by Brian David Ledahl for Network-1 Technologies, Inc. have been accepted by the court: 01/08/2026, 01/09/2026. [1132490] [MJL] [Entered: 12/04/2025 03:02 PM]

  9. #582025-12-04

    The following conflict dates requested by Andrew V. Trask for YouTube, LLC and Google LLC (see Doc. No. [55]) are not accepted at this time: 02/02/2026, 02/03/2026, 02/04/2026, 02/05/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/09/2026. Please review the Guidance on Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts for more information. [1132483] [MJL] [Entered: 12/04/2025 02:53 PM]

  10. #572025-12-04

    The following conflict dates submitted by Andrew V. Trask for YouTube, LLC and Google LLC have been accepted by the court: 03/03/2026, 03/04/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/06/2026. [1132481] [MJL] [Entered: 12/04/2025 02:52 PM]

  11. #562025-12-02

    Notice from Appellant Network-1 Technologies, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 12/02/2025 by email. [1131917] [24-1893] [Brian Ledahl] [Entered: 12/02/2025 11:15 PM]

  12. #552025-12-02

    Notice from Appellees Google LLC and YouTube, LLC regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 12/02/2025 by email. [1131913] [24-1893] [Andrew Trask] [Entered: 12/02/2025 10:38 PM]

  13. #542025-11-25

    Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [1130527] [MJL] [Entered: 11/25/2025 12:49 PM]

  14. #532025-06-17

    The following conflict dates submitted by Brian David Ledahl for Network-1 Technologies, Inc. have been accepted by the court: 08/04/2025, 08/05/2025, 08/06/2025, 08/07/2025, 08/08/2025, 10/06/2025, 10/07/2025, 10/08/2025, 10/09/2025, 10/10/2025. [1096804] [MJL] [Entered: 06/17/2025 08:59 AM]

  15. #522025-06-13

    Notice from Appellant Network-1 Technologies, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 06/13/2025 by email. [1096412] [24-1893] [Brian Ledahl] [Entered: 06/13/2025 06:14 PM]

  16. #512025-06-13

    Notice from Appellees Google LLC and YouTube, LLC regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 06/13/2025 by email. [1096245] [24-1893] [Andrew Trask] [Entered: 06/13/2025 01:37 PM]

  17. #502025-06-06

    Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [1094676] [MMA] [Entered: 06/06/2025 02:44 PM]

  18. #492025-04-18

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [24], [38], [44] received from Appellant Network-1 Technologies, Inc. [1083532] [CDL] [Entered: 04/18/2025 11:28 AM]

  19. #482025-04-17

    ORDER filed granting the motions to the extent that ECF No. 33 is stricken and ECF No. 42 and its exhibit shall remain sealed with access restricted in accordance with Federal Circuit Rule 25.1. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1083341] [LMS] [Entered: 04/17/2025 11:16 AM]

  20. #472025-04-15

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [27] received from Appellees Google LLC and YouTube, LLC. [1082620] [MVH] [Entered: 04/15/2025 11:50 AM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-19