VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation
Summary
VLSI Technology sues Intel for patent infringement in federal court.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage events: 5P · 2D · 6N (23 articles)
Latest ruling: neutral (2026-04-14)
Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
9 plaintiff-favorable · 7 defendant-favorable · 7 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 5 plaintiff · 2 defendant · 6 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
- US appeals court restarts $3 billion patent infringement lawsuit against IntelMSN · 2026-05-24
- US appeals court restarts $3 billion patent infringement lawsuit against IntelMSN · 2026-05-16
- US appeals court reopens VLSI's multi billion dollar patent suit against IntelYahoo Finance · 2026-04-16
- VLSI Gets Extra Shot Against Intel in California Patent Suit (2)Bloomberg Law News · 2026-04-14
- Intel scores key jury ruling in $3 billion patent duel with VLSI — ruling threatens prior patent verdictsTom's Hardware · 2025-05-31
- Intel wins crucial verdict in legal fight against patent troll VLSITechSpot · 2025-05-30
- US jury sides with Intel in dispute over VLSI patent licensing rightsTech Monitor · 2025-05-30
- Intel Deals Blow to Fortress in $3 Billion Patent ClashWall Street Pit · 2025-05-29
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Direct: 310-277-1010Alan J. Heinrich, Benjamin W. Hattenbach, Esq., Attorney, Charlotte J. Wen, - +2 more
- Independent counselJeffrey A. Lamken, -, Lucas M. Walker
- Direct: 310-203-7672Elizabeth C. Tuan
- Direct: 312-450-6704Elizabeth Kathleen Clarke, -
- Direct: 949-760-0991Babak Redjaian, Attorney
- Direct: 310-203-7000Morgan Chu, Esq.
- Direct: 617-526-6000Andrew J. Danford, Dominic E. Massa, William F. Lee
- Direct: 617-526-6396Joseph J. Mueller
- Direct: 720-274-3164Mary Virginia Sooter, Attorney
- Independent counselLouis W. Tompros
- Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Docket no.
- 24-1772
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2024-05-02
- Last filing
- 2026-04-14
Entities in this case
Parties
INTEL CORPORATION VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC
Docket entries
- #732026-04-14
JUDGMENT. REVERSED-IN-PART, AFFIRMED-IN-PART, AND REMANDED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: No Costs. Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1159475] [MVH] [Entered: 04/14/2026 10:01 AM]
- #722026-04-14
OPINION filed for the court by Moore, Chief Judge; Chen, Circuit Judge and Kleeh, Chief Judge. Precedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1159472] [MVH] [Entered: 04/14/2026 09:58 AM]
- #712026-02-05
Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Moore, Chief Judge; Chen, Circuit Judge and Kleeh, Chief District Judge.Arguing counsel: Lucas M. Walker for VLSI Technology LLC and Dominic E. Massa for Intel Corporation.Oral Argument Audio available here. [1145475]--[Edited 04/14/2026 by MVH to update arguing counsel] [MJL] [Entered: 02/05/2026 05:07 PM]
- #702026-02-04
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: The names of the individuals who electronically signed VLSI Technology LLC's motion [66] and response to notice of oral argument [68] did not match the user accounts that electronically filed the documents. CORRECTION: Please ensure future electronic signatures comply with FCR 25(g). This is the fourth notice issued to the party on this subject. THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [1145174]--[Edited 02/04/2026 by MJL to correct docket text] [MJL] [Entered: 02/04/2026 06:32 PM]
- #692026-02-04
Notice from Appellee Intel Corporation of Withdrawal of Stephanie Lin as Counsel. Service: 02/04/2026 by email. [1145021] [24-1772] [Andrew Danford] [Entered: 02/04/2026 11:29 AM]
- #682026-02-04
Amended Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant VLSI Technology LLC. Service: 02/04/2026 by email. [1145006] [24-1772] [Jeffrey Lamken] [Entered: 02/04/2026 10:48 AM]
- #672026-02-03
ORDER filed denying VLSI Technology LLC's motion [66] to reschedule oral argument. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1144678] [MJL] [Entered: 02/03/2026 10:55 AM]
- #662026-02-02
MOTION of Appellant VLSI Technology LLC to reschedule argument. Service: 02/02/2026 by email. [1144573] [24-1772] [Charlotte Wen] [Entered: 02/02/2026 06:16 PM]
- #652026-01-27
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: The name of the individual who electronically signed VLSI Technology LLC's response to notice of oral argument [63] does not match the user account that filed the document. CORRECTION: Please ensure future electronic signatures comply with Fed. Cir. R. 25(g). THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [1143352] [MJL] [Entered: 01/27/2026 02:39 PM]
- #642026-01-02
Clerk's letter to the parties regarding February court session logistics. Arguing counsel are to complete the Emergency Notification Form linked in this letter no later than 01/23/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1138203] [MJL] [Entered: 01/02/2026 03:23 PM]
- #632025-12-29
Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant VLSI Technology LLC. Service: 12/29/2025 by email. [1137278] [24-1772] [Charlotte Wen] [Entered: 12/29/2025 06:45 PM]
- #622025-12-29
Response to notice of oral argument from Appellee Intel Corporation. Service: 12/29/2025 by email. [1136922] [24-1772] [Dominic Massa] [Entered: 12/29/2025 10:02 AM]
- #612025-12-17
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2602G. Case scheduled February 5, 2026. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 12/31/2025. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1135243] [JSP] [Entered: 12/17/2025 10:44 AM]
- #602025-11-12
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: The name of the individual who electronically signed VLSI Technology LLC's response to notice to advise of scheduling conflicts [57] does not match the user account that filed the document. CORRECTION: Please ensure future electronic signatures comply with FCR 25(g). THIS MESSAGE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. [1127455] [MJL] [Entered: 11/12/2025 04:56 PM]
- #592025-11-12
The following conflict dates requested by Alan J. Heinrich for VLSI Technology LLC (see Doc. No. [57]) are not accepted at this time: 01/05/2026, 01/06/2026, 01/07/2026, 01/08/2026, 01/09/2026. Please review the Guidance on Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts for more information. [1127442] [MJL] [Entered: 11/12/2025 04:48 PM]
- #582025-11-12
The following conflict dates submitted by Alan J. Heinrich for VLSI Technology LLC have been accepted by the court: 01/12/2026, 02/09/2026. [1127440] [MJL] [Entered: 11/12/2025 04:48 PM]
- #572025-11-10
Notice from Appellant VLSI Technology LLC regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 11/10/2025 by email. [1127018] [24-1772] [Charlotte Wen] [Entered: 11/10/2025 06:51 PM]
- #562025-11-10
The following conflict dates submitted by Dominic E. Massa for Intel Corporation have been accepted by the court: 01/12/2026, 02/09/2026, 06/01/2026, 06/02/2026, 06/03/2026, 06/04/2026, 06/05/2026. [1126767] [MJL] [Entered: 11/10/2025 10:20 AM]
- #552025-11-10
Notice from Appellee Intel Corporation regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 11/10/2025 by email. [1126746] [24-1772] [Dominic Massa] [Entered: 11/10/2025 10:00 AM]
- #542025-11-04
Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [1125449] [KMK] [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:56 PM]
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.