Neonode Smartphone LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

Neonode sues Samsung for infringing its smartphone touchscreen patents.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Latest ruling: plaintiff (2024-08-20)

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Docket no.
23-2304
Nature of suit
Patent
Filed
2023-08-21
Last filing
2024-09-26

Entities in this case

Docket entries

  1. #422024-09-26

    Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1035035] [MVH] [Entered: 09/26/2024 09:03 AM]

  2. #412024-08-20

    JUDGMENT. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellee(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1026188] [MVH] [Entered: 08/20/2024 08:39 AM]

  3. #402024-08-20

    OPINION filed for the court by Lourie, Circuit Judge; Prost, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge. Nonprecedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1026186] [MVH] [Entered: 08/20/2024 08:39 AM]

  4. #392024-06-06

    Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Lourie, Circuit Judge; Prost, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge.Arguing counsel: Philip Graves for Neonode Smartphone LLC and Mr. Stanley Joseph Panikowski, III for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.Oral Argument Audio available here. [1009398] [JCP] [Entered: 06/06/2024 02:32 PM]

  5. #382024-05-24

    Clerk's Note to the File: This appeal will now be argued second before the assigned merits panel. [1006564] [MVH] [Entered: 05/24/2024 04:11 PM]

  6. #372024-05-03

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. Service: 05/03/2024 by email. [1002086] [23-2304] [Stanley Panikowski] [Entered: 05/03/2024 05:07 PM]

  7. #352024-05-03

    Corrected Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Neonode Smartphone LLC. Service: 05/03/2024 by email. [1002005] [23-2304] [Philip Graves] [Entered: 05/03/2024 02:05 PM]

  8. #362024-05-02

    Supplementary Media Appendix received on CD-ROM from Neonode Smartphone LLC. Number of copies: 4. [1002041] [VDW] [Entered: 05/03/2024 03:26 PM]

  9. #342024-04-25

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [23] received from Appellees Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. [1000264] [VDW] [Entered: 04/26/2024 09:40 AM]

  10. #332024-04-22

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [27], [26], [17] received from Appellant Neonode Smartphone LLC. [999755] [VDW] [Entered: 04/24/2024 01:45 PM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-19