Applications In Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.
Summary
Applications In Internet Time sues Salesforce for patent infringement over cloud-based software technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage events: 1P · 2D · 0N (6 articles)
Latest ruling: defendant (2026-03-16)
Press coverage leans defendant-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
1 plaintiff-favorable · 5 defendant-favorable · 0 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 1 plaintiff · 2 defendant · 0 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
- Patent Owner Wants Revival of Salesforce Infringement DisputeBloomberg Law News · 2025-09-16
- Salesforce Dodges Full Fed. Circ. Review Of IP WinLaw360 · 2026-06-12
- Salesforce Dodges Full Fed. Circ. Review Of IP WinLaw360 · 2026-06-12
- Salesforce Beats IP Suit As Fed. Circ. Affirms No StandingLaw360 · 2026-03-16
- Salesforce Beats IP Suit As Fed. Circ. Affirms No StandingLaw360 · 2026-03-16
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Direct: 212-319-4755Andrea Pacelli, Charles Wizenfeld, Michael DeVincenzo
- Direct: 805-230-1350Steven C. Sereboff, Attorney
- Independent counselOgnjen Zivojnovic, -, Ray Robert Zado, Sam Stephen Stake, Attorney
- Direct: (650)-801-5015Kevin P.B. Johnson, Senior Trial Attorney
- Direct: 202-538-8000Derek L. Shaffer
- Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Docket no.
- 25-2026
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2025-08-18
- Last filing
- 2026-03-16
Entities in this case
Parties
SALESFORCE, INC. APPLICATIONS IN INTERNET TIME, LLC
Docket entries
- #472026-03-16
JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellant(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1153129] [MVH] [Entered: 03/16/2026 10:19 AM]
- #462026-03-16
OPINION filed for the court by Lourie, Circuit Judge; Chen, Circuit Judge and Stoll, Circuit Judge. Nonprecedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1153127] [MVH] [Entered: 03/16/2026 10:18 AM]
- #452026-02-09
Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Lourie, Circuit Judge; Chen, Circuit Judge and Stoll, Circuit Judge.Arguing counsel: Michael DeVincenzo for Applications In Internet Time, LLC and Derek L. Shaffer for Salesforce, Inc.Oral Argument Audio available here. [1146115] [MJL] [Entered: 02/09/2026 05:37 PM]
- #442026-01-02
Clerk's letter to the parties regarding February court session logistics. Arguing counsel are to complete the Emergency Notification Form linked in this letter no later than 01/23/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1138237] [MJL] [Entered: 01/02/2026 03:55 PM]
- #432026-01-02
Entry of Appearance for Derek L. Shaffer as counsel for Appellee Salesforce, Inc.. Service: 12/31/2025 by email. [1138061] [MVH] [Entered: 01/02/2026 12:51 PM]
- #422026-01-02
ORDER filed granting motion for leave for Derek L. Shaffer to appear as counsel [40] filed by Appellee Salesforce, Inc. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1138057] [MVH] [Entered: 01/02/2026 12:46 PM]
- #412025-12-31
Response to notice of oral argument from Appellee Salesforce, Inc.. Service: 12/31/2025 by email. [1137904] [25-2026] [Ray Zado] [Entered: 12/31/2025 06:28 PM]
- #402025-12-31
MOTION of Appellee Salesforce, Inc. APPELLEE SALESFORCE, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ENTRY OF APPEARANCE. Service: 12/31/2025 by email. [1137903] [25-2026] [Ray Zado] [Entered: 12/31/2025 06:26 PM]
- #392025-12-30
Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Applications In Internet Time, LLC. Service: 12/30/2025 by email. [1137456] [25-2026] [Michael DeVincenzo] [Entered: 12/30/2025 01:31 PM]
- #382025-12-17
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2602L. Case scheduled February 9, 2026. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 12/31/2025. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1135344] [KMK] [Entered: 12/17/2025 01:36 PM]
- #372025-12-15
The following conflict dates submitted by Kevin P.B. Johnson for Salesforce, Inc. have been accepted by the court: 04/08/2026, 04/09/2026, 04/10/2026. [1134865] [MJL] [Entered: 12/15/2025 04:19 PM]
- #362025-12-15
Notice from Appellee Salesforce, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 12/15/2025 by email. [1134792] [25-2026] [Kevin Johnson] [Entered: 12/15/2025 01:39 PM]
- #352025-12-12
6 paper copies of Doc. No. [21] received from Appellee Salesforce, Inc. [1134627] [CDL] [Entered: 12/12/2025 04:44 PM]
- #342025-12-10
NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The paper copies (Doc. No. [25]) provided by Salesforce, Inc. are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Corrected paper copies are due within 5 business days. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1133713] [CDL] [Entered: 12/10/2025 08:52 AM]
- #332025-12-10
The following conflict dates requested by Kevin P.B. Johnson for Salesforce, Inc. (see Doc. No. [31]) are not accepted at this time: 04/08/2026, 04/09/2026, 04/10/2026. Please review the Guidance on Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts for more information. [1133700] [MJL] [Entered: 12/10/2025 08:17 AM]
- #322025-12-10
The following conflict dates submitted by Kevin P.B. Johnson for Salesforce, Inc. have been accepted by the court: 02/04/2026, 03/09/2026, 06/01/2026, 06/02/2026, 06/03/2026, 06/04/2026, 06/05/2026. [1133698] [MJL] [Entered: 12/10/2025 08:16 AM]
- #312025-12-09
Notice from Appellee Salesforce, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 12/09/2025 by email. [1133656] [25-2026] [Kevin Johnson] [Entered: 12/09/2025 04:59 PM]
- #302025-12-02
Notice from Appellant Applications In Internet Time, LLC regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 12/02/2025 by email. [1131646] [25-2026] [Michael DeVincenzo] [Entered: 12/02/2025 01:06 PM]
- #292025-12-01
Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [1131249] [IMH] [Entered: 12/01/2025 02:09 PM]
- #282025-11-25
6 paper copies of Doc. No. [24] received from Appellant Applications In Internet Time, LLC. [1130660] [JSP] [Entered: 11/25/2025 03:24 PM]
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.