PatentFed. Cir.26-1033

ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Summary

ParkerVision sues Qualcomm for allegedly infringing its patents related to wireless communication technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityPress: plaintiff

Coverage events: 3P · 2D · 6N (18 articles)

Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

4 plaintiff-favorable · 2 defendant-favorable · 12 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 3 plaintiff · 2 defendant · 6 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable
Defendant-favorable

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2025-10-13 · coverage 1P / 0D / 3N2025-10-20 · coverage 2P / 0D / 1N2025-10-27 · coverage 0P / 1D / 1N2026-03-23 · coverage 1P / 0D / 3N2026-04-20 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1N2026-05-04 · coverage 0P / 0D / 3N2026-06-01 · coverage 0P / 1D / 0NDocketFiled 2025-10-092026-03-17 · filing · favors defendant MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. and Qualcomm In…2026-03-23 · filing · favors plaintiff MODIFIED ENTRY: REPLY BRIEF FILED by ParkerVision, Inc. Service: 03/23/2026 by email. [1…Oct 25Feb 26Jun 26filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Docket no.
26-1033
Nature of suit
Patent
Filed
2025-10-09
Last filing
2026-06-01

Entities in this case

Qualcomm6ParkerVision2

Docket entries

  1. #462026-06-01

    Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Prost, Circuit Judge; Chen, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge.Arguing counsel: Joshua Wright Budwin for ParkerVision, Inc. and Sophie Hood for Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc.Oral Argument Audio available here. [1170775] [MJL] [Entered: 06/01/2026 04:50 PM]

  2. #452026-04-24

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellees Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. and Qualcomm Incorporated. Service: 04/24/2026 by email. [1162458] [26-1033] [Sophie Hood] [Entered: 04/24/2026 03:47 PM]

  3. #442026-04-21

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant ParkerVision, Inc.. Service: 04/21/2026 by email. [1161533] [26-1033] [Joshua Budwin] [Entered: 04/21/2026 06:33 PM]

  4. #432026-04-21

    NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2606A. Case scheduled June 1, 2026. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 05/05/2026. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1161404] [MMA] [Entered: 04/21/2026 02:18 PM]

  5. #412026-04-02

    Notice of Correction to Doc No. [39] for Appellant ParkerVision, Inc.. Service: 04/02/2026 by email. [1157166] [26-1033] [Charles Fowler] [Entered: 04/02/2026 11:11 AM]

  6. #402026-04-02

    NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of ParkerVision, Inc., Confidential Joint Appendix [39], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due 04/09/2026. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1157138] [MJL] [Entered: 04/02/2026 09:58 AM]

  7. #392026-04-01

    MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX FILED by ParkerVision, Inc. Service: 04/01/2026 by email. [1156884]--[Edited 04/02/2026 by MJL - compliance review complete] [Charles Fowler] [Entered: 04/01/2026 11:53 AM]

  8. #382026-03-31

    The following conflict dates submitted by Sophie Hood for Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. have been accepted by the court: 06/04/2026, 06/05/2026, 08/03/2026, 08/04/2026, 08/05/2026, 08/06/2026, 08/07/2026. [1156384] [MJL] [Entered: 03/31/2026 08:25 AM]

  9. #372026-03-30

    Notice from Appellees Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 03/30/2026 by email. [1156227] [26-1033] [Sophie Hood] [Entered: 03/30/2026 02:36 PM]

  10. #422026-03-25

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [24], [29] received from Appellant ParkerVision, Inc. [1160610] [CDL] [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:09 PM]

  11. #362026-03-24

    Certificate of Compliance with Fed. Cir. R. 25.1(c)(2) for Appellant ParkerVision, Inc.. Service: 03/24/2026 by email. [1155265] [26-1033] [Charles Fowler] [Entered: 03/24/2026 04:23 PM]

  12. #342026-03-24

    Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [1155066] [MJL] [Entered: 03/24/2026 11:14 AM]

  13. #332026-03-24

    Notice to the parties: The record of this case indicates that no Certificate of Compliance pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 25.1(c)(2)(A) has been filed. If any portion of the record is subject to a protective order, you must file the required certificate using the Certificate of Compliance-Protective Order event. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1155063] [MJL] [Entered: 03/24/2026 11:10 AM]

  14. #322026-03-24

    Paper copies of the reply brief [29] and confidential appendix [30] must be submitted within five business days from the date of issuance of this notice. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(3)(A). [1155060] [MJL] [Entered: 03/24/2026 11:09 AM]

  15. #352026-03-23

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [27] received from Appellees Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. and Qualcomm Incorporated. [1155142] [CDL] [Entered: 03/24/2026 01:48 PM]

  16. #312026-03-23

    MODIFIED ENTRY: APPENDIX FILED by ParkerVision, Inc., Qualcomm Atheros, Inc., and Qualcomm Incorporated. Service: 03/23/2026 by email. [1154926]--[Edited 03/24/2026 by MJL - compliance review complete] [Charles Fowler] [Entered: 03/23/2026 05:24 PM]

  17. #302026-03-23

    MODIFIED ENTRY: CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX FILED by ParkerVision, Inc., Qualcomm Atheros, Inc., and Qualcomm Incorporated. Service: 03/23/2026 by email. [1154924]--[Edited 03/24/2026 by MJL - compliance review complete]. This appendix has been corrected. See Doc. Nos. [39], [41]. [Charles Fowler] [Entered: 03/23/2026 05:13 PM]

  18. #292026-03-23

    MODIFIED ENTRY: REPLY BRIEF FILED by ParkerVision, Inc. Service: 03/23/2026 by email. [1154911]--[Edited 03/24/2026 by MJL - compliance review complete] [Charles Fowler] [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:58 PM]

  19. #282026-03-18

    Paper copies of the opening brief [24] and corrected response brief [27] must be submitted within five business days from the date of issuance of this notice. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(3)(A). [1153852] [MJL] [Entered: 03/18/2026 04:01 PM]

  20. #272026-03-17

    MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED RESPONSE BRIEF FILED by Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. and Qualcomm Incorporated. Service: 03/17/2026 by email. [1153687]--[Edited 03/18/2026 by MJL - compliance review complete] [Robert Van Nest] [Entered: 03/17/2026 07:37 PM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-07-07