Sega Corporation v. Lindsey

Summary

Sega sues Jamarie Lindsey for copyright infringement over unauthorized use of Sega's intellectual property.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

17:0501 Copyright Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Sega Corporation (plaintiff) Jamarie Lindsey (defendant)

Docket entries

1. #192026-07-31

   Form AO 120/121

2. #182026-07-31

   Judgment AND Permanent Injunction

3. #172026-06-30

   Judgment; Exhibit Proposed Consent Judgment

4. 2026-05-20

   Order Scheduling Mediation

5. #152026-05-04

   Notice of Mediator Selection and/or Hearing

6. #142026-03-19

   - Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

7. #132026-03-19

   Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge AND Order Referring Case to Mediation AND Scheduling Order

8. #122026-03-18

   Answer to Complaint

9. #112026-03-12

   Scheduling Report - Rule 26(f)/16.1

10. #102026-02-12

    PAPERLESS ORDER To the extent there are issues contemplated by Rules 26(f) and 16(b) that the parties have yet to discuss, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to meet for a Local Rule 16.1(b) scheduling conference by Friday, February 27, 2025, in person, by telephone, or by other comparable means for the purposes prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and Local Rule 16.1(b). Within fourteen days following the conclusion of the aforementioned conference, the parties shall submit to the Court both a written report outlining the discovery plan that shall contain the information required by Local Rule 16.1(b)(2) and an accompanying joint proposed scheduling order that shall contain the information required by Local Rule 16.1(b)(3). Signed by Judge Ed Artau (mdn) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

11. 2026-02-12

    - Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

12. #92026-02-10

    PAPERLESS ORDER granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document. Jamarie Lindsey's Response/Answer due 3/11/2026. Signed by Judge Ed Artau (mdn) (Entered: 02/10/2026)

13. 2026-02-10

    Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer

14. #82026-02-09

    Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 1 Complaint by Jamarie Lindsey. Responses due by 2/23/2026. (wce) (Entered: 02/09/2026)

15. #72026-02-06

    PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice 6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer. Defendant's Motion does not comply with Local Rule 7.1(a), which states, "At the end of the motion, and above the signature block, counsel for the moving party shall certify either: (A) that counsel for the movant has conferred with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in the motion and has been unable to do so; or (B) that counsel for the movant has made reasonable efforts to confer with all parties or non-parties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion, which efforts shall be identified with specificity in the statement (including the date, time, and manner of each effort), but has been unable to do so. If certain of the issues have been resolved by agreement, the certification shall specify the issues so resolved and the issues remaining unresolved." Instead, Plaintiff's Motion contains the following statement: "Plaintiff's counsel has indicated that they are amenable to an extension of time, or has not indicated any opposition at this time." Thus, it is ultimately unclear whether the Motion is opposed or whether Defendant simply has not received any indication from Plaintiff's counsel one way or the other. Accordingly, the Motion is denied without prejudice and with leave to re-file in compliance with Local Rule 7.1(a). Signed by Judge Ed Artau (mdn) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

16. #62026-02-06

    DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO 1 COMPLAINT by Jamarie Lindsey. Responses due by 2/20/2026. (wce) (Entered: 02/06/2026)

17. 2026-02-06

    Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer

18. #52026-01-22

    SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on 1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Sega Corporation. Jamarie Lindsey served on 1/17/2026, response/answer due 2/9/2026. (Nelles, Matthew) (Entered: 01/22/2026)

19. #42026-01-08

    Summons Issued as to Jamarie Lindsey. (drz) (Entered: 01/08/2026)

20. 2026-01-08

    Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment and Optional Consent

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.