Wapp Tech Limited Partnership v. Apple Inc. <b><font color="red">Transferred to the Southern District of California</b></font>

Summary

Wapp Tech sues Apple for patent infringement, with Cullen/Frost and Capital One also named parties.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

15:1126 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Wapp Tech Corp. (plaintiff) Wapp Tech Limited Partnership (plaintiff) Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (defendant) Frost Bank (defendant) Capital One Services LLC (defendant) Capital One N.A. (defendant) Apple Inc. (defendant)

Docket entries

1. 2026-05-11

   Telephone Conference

2. 2026-05-11

   Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant: Telephone Conference held regarding discovery disputes on 5/11/2026 from 10:30 a.m. - 11:07 a.m. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Blaine Larson; Defense - Indranil Mukerji, Travis Underwood, Michael Bowlus, Ranganath Sudarshan. After hearing argument from counsel regarding three discovery disputes, the Court finds as follows: As to Interrogatory No. 1, the Court denies Plaintiffs request and finds that Defendants proposed compromise is sufficient to meet the needs of discovery. Defendant shall produce information in accordance with the compromise offered. As to Interrogatory No. 15, which seeks identification and description of revenues and profits, including gross, contribution, and net profit, generated by Apple since 2019 from the sale of third-party mobile applications through the App Store, including in-app purchases and app subscriptions, the Court authorizes Plaintiff to file a motion to compel if Defendants response to Interrogatory No. 16 does not sufficiently address the information sought in Interrogatory No. 15 and/or if the parties are unable to otherwise resolve the dispute. The parties may re-raise the dispute regarding Interrogatory No. 15 with the Court after Defendant serves its response to Interrogatory No. 16, if necessary. As to Interrogatory No. 16, which seeks identification since 2019 of third-party mobile applications whose sales and/or commissions generated the largest profits, the Court grants Plaintiffs request and orders Apple to respond to Interrogatory No. 16. No exhibits. (Court Reporter - Chris Bickham) (kkc)

3. 2026-04-06

   Notice of Hearing

4. 2026-04-02

   Telephone Conference

5. 2026-04-01

   Notice of Hearing

6. 2026-03-31

   Notice of Hearing

7. 2026-02-02

   Notice of Hearing

8. 2026-01-15

   Discovery Hearing

9. 2025-11-05

   Telephone Conference

10. 2025-11-03

    Notice of Hearing

11. 2025-10-27

    Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference

12. 2025-10-23

    Remark

13. 2025-08-14

    Update Answer Deadline

14. 2025-08-14

    Answer Due Deadline Updated for Apple Inc. to 9/5/2025; Capital One N.A. to 9/5/2025; Capital One Services LLC to 9/5/2025; Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. to 9/5/2025; Frost Bank to 9/5/2025. (mmc)

15. 2025-05-28

    Clerk's Entry re Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

16. 2025-05-27

    Clerk's Entry re Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

17. 2025-05-22

    Clerk's Entry re Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

18. 2025-03-07

    Notice of Magistrate Judge Availability

19. 2025-03-07

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

20. 2025-03-06

    Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. (mmc)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.