Kharat v. Kreutzer

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Nagnath Kharat sues Marie Kreutzer and Film AG Produktions over copyright infringement related to film production.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff

17:501 Copyright Infringement

Nagnath Kharat (plaintiff) Does 1-10, (defendant) Film AG Produktions GmbH (defendant) Marie Kreutzer (defendant)

#282026-09-02
Memo Endorsement AND ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings
#272026-08-31
Notice of Change of Address
#262026-08-31
Notice (Other)
#252026-08-31
Amended Complaint
#242026-08-31
Seal
#232026-08-13
Order
#222026-05-14
Remark
#212026-05-13
Remark
#202026-05-12
FRCP 4 Service Package - Mailed
2026-05-12
Summons Issued
2026-05-06
Mailing Receipt
2026-05-06
Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment
2026-04-28
Mailing Receipt
2026-04-27
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 9. Mailed to: Nagnath Kharat B-402 Lodha Panacea Dombivli East Thane, Maharashtra, 421204 India. (nb)
2026-04-27
Mailing Receipt
2026-04-24
Case Designated ECF. (kgo)
2026-04-24
Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment - Sua Sponte
2026-04-24
Note Regarding Service on Self-Represented Party
2026-04-24
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(kgo)
2026-04-24
CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see Rule 9.2 of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information..(kgo)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.