Patent S.D.N.Y.1:22-cv-00082

Nike, Inc. v. Lululemon USA Inc.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Nike sues Lululemon for allegedly infringing patents on athletic apparel technology and design.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Coverage events: 6P · 7D · 16N (101 articles)

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

16 plaintiff-favorable · 18 defendant-favorable · 67 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 6 plaintiff · 7 defendant · 16 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable

Judge rejects Nike request for dismissal in sports bra patent lawsuitClass Action Lawsuits · 2025-05-02
Nike Wins Partial Victory In Patent Lawsuit Against LululemonMarathon Handbook · 2025-03-17
Nike secures partial win over Lululemon in patent infringement caseSports Business Journal · 2025-03-12
Lululemon Owes Nike $355,000 Over Flyknit Patents, Jury Says (1)Bloomberg Law News · 2025-03-11

Defendant-favorable

Nike Drops Sports Watch Patent Suit After PTAB Loss to LululemonBloomberg Law News · 2026-09-18
Nike and Lululemon Settle Lawsuit Over Mirror Home GymSGB Media Online · 2026-09-18
Nike and Lululemon End Mirror Patent DisputeLawyer Monthly · 2026-09-18
Fed. Circ. OKs Lululemon Win On Nike Fitness Tracking PatentLaw360 · 2026-05-13

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPAaron Patrick Bowling, Christopher J. Renk, Michael J Harris
Independent counselLindsey Staubach, Michael Joshua Gershoni
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLPMichael Jonathan Sebba
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholler LLPKathleen Duffy Lichtenstein
Arnold & Porter LLPBridgette Gershoni
Office of the County CounselBonnie Phan
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (DC)Amy L. Dewitt

For the defendant

Morrison & Foerster LLPDiek Van Nort, Jennifer Jeanne Schmidt, Kyle D. Friedland
Morrison & Foerster LLP (NYC)Kyle W. Mooney
Morrison Foerster LLPForrest McClellen , I
Independent counselStefani Elise Shanberg

Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Docket no.: 1:22-cv-00082
Nature of suit: Patent
Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Filed: 2022-01-05
Last filing: 2026-09-17

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Nike14 Lululemon USA

Parties

Nike, Inc. (plaintiff) Lululemon USA Inc. (defendant) Curiouser Products Inc. (defendant) Lululemon Athletica Inc. (defendant)

Docket entries

2023-01-23
No description on file
2023-01-18
No description on file
2022-12-01
No description on file
2022-11-28
No description on file
2022-09-07
No description on file
2022-04-29
No description on file
2022-04-28
No description on file
2022-04-10
No description on file
2022-04-06
No description on file
2022-01-26
No description on file
2022-01-24
No description on file
2022-01-21
No description on file
2022-01-18
No description on file
2022-01-18
No description on file
2022-01-14
No description on file
2022-01-06
No description on file
2022-01-06
No description on file
2022-01-06
No description on file
2022-01-06
No description on file
2022-01-06
No description on file

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on X LinkedIn

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-09-17

Summary

Coverage vs reality meter