CopyrightE.D.N.Y.1:25-cv-02226

Rouzier v. Gilles

Summary

Fabrice Rouzier sues Joe Gilles and music companies for copyright infringement over a song.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityPress: plaintiff

Coverage: 1P · 0D · 4N

Latest ruling: defendant (2025-05-20)

Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the headlines behind the meter

1 plaintiff-favorable · 0 defendant-favorable · 4 neutral

Plaintiff-favorable
Defendant-favorable

None classified yet.

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2025-04-21 · coverage 1P / 0D / 3N2025-04-28 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1NDocketFiled 2025-04-222025-05-20 · ruling · favors defendant ORDER TO ANSWER re 18 : Answer due 6/23/2025. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. P…Apr 25May 25May 25filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Docket no.
1:25-cv-02226
Nature of suit
Copyright
Judge
Natasha C. Merle
Filed
2025-04-22
Last filing
2026-09-01

Cause

17:101 Copyright Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Daniel Fils Aime Universal Music Publishing France Atlantic Records Group Damini Ogulu Play Two DF Empire Joe Gilles B.E. Relations LLC Fabrice Rouzier

Docket entries

  1. 2026-05-22

    No description on file

  2. 2025-12-10

    No description on file

  3. 2025-12-04

    No description on file

  4. 2025-10-23

    No description on file

  5. 2025-10-23

    No description on file

  6. 2025-10-23

    No description on file

  7. 2025-10-15

    No description on file

  8. 2025-10-08

    No description on file

  9. 2025-09-16

    ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the Motion to Vacate the Clerk's Entry of Default 43 and the Declaration in Support of the same 44 . Any opposition must be filed on or before September 23, 2025. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Clay H. Kaminsky on 9/16/2025. (TJT)

  10. 2025-08-15

    No description on file

  11. 2025-08-06

    No description on file

  12. 2025-07-22

    No description on file

  13. 2025-07-15

    No description on file

  14. 2025-07-08

    ELECTRONIC ORDER: The Initial Conference previously set for 8/12/2025 is hereby adjourned sine die pending reassignment to a new Magistrate Judge. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 7/8/2025. (LMD)

  15. 2025-06-17

    No description on file

  16. 2025-05-22

    No description on file

  17. 2025-05-20

    No description on file

  18. 2025-05-20

    ORDER TO ANSWER re 18 : Answer due 6/23/2025. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 5/20/2025. (DC)

  19. 2025-04-24

    No description on file

  20. 2025-04-24

    No description on file

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-09-01