CopyrightC.D. Cal.2:25-cv-03944Closed

Empawa Africa Music Services Limited v. Benito Martinez Ocasio

Get an email if this closed case reopens or anything new is filed.

Summary

Empawa Africa sues Bad Bunny and distributors for copyright infringement over unauthorized music use.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Docket no.
2:25-cv-03944
Nature of suit
Copyright
Judge
Otis D. Wright, II
Disposition
judgment
Filed
2025-05-02
Last filing
2026-08-20
Terminated
2026-03-09

Cause

17:101 Copyright Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Ezeani Chidera Godfrey (plaintiff) Empawa Africa Music Services Limited (plaintiff) Bad Bunny (defendant) Orchard Enterprises NY (defendant) Does (defendant) Apple Inc. (defendant) Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. (defendant) Spotify USA Inc. (defendant) Songs of Universal, Inc. (defendant) Universal Music Corp. (defendant) Marco Daniel Borrero (defendant) Creative Park Publishing (defendant) Roberto Jose Rosado Torres, Jr. (defendant) RSM Publishing LLC (defendant) Rimas Entertainment LLC (defendant) Orchard Enterprises LLC (defendant) Orchard Enterprises NY, Inc. (defendant) Benito Antonio Martinez Ocasio (defendant)

Docket entries

  1. #1272026-08-20

    ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES 115 , 116 Defendants Bad Bunny,Orchard Enterprises LLC, Rimas Entertainment LLC, Spotify USA Inc., and AppleInc. now move for attorneys fees and costs against only Empawa under the Copyright Act. (Mot . Att'ys' Fees Dkt. No. 115.) Defendants RSM Publishing LLC, Universal Music Corp., and Songs of Universal, Inc. join in the Motion. (Joinder, Dkt. No. 116.) The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC REASONS AS DISCUSSED HEREIN).Motion. (lc)

  2. #1262026-05-11

    Motion Related Document

  3. #1252026-05-06

    The hearing on the MOTION for Attorney Fees 115, scheduled for May 18, 2026 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 05/06/2026)

  4. 2026-05-06

    Generic Text Only Entry

  5. #1242026-05-04

    Reply (Motion related)

  6. #1232026-05-04

    Declaration

  7. #1222026-05-04

    Reply (Motion related)

  8. #1212026-04-20

    Memorandum in Opposition to Motion

  9. #1202026-03-27

    Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

  10. #1192026-03-27

    Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123)

  11. #1182026-03-27

    Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines AND ~Util - Terminate Hearings

  12. #1172026-03-26

    Continue

  13. #1162026-03-23

    Joinder (Motion Related); Declaration of A. Sasha Frid

  14. 2026-03-10

    Judgment

  15. 2026-01-15

    Text Only Scheduling Notice

  16. 2026-01-05

    Generic Text Only Entry

  17. 2025-12-11

    Discovery Hearing AND For Order re Discovery Matter

  18. 2025-11-13

    Text Only Scheduling Notice

  19. 2025-07-24

    Appear Pro Hac Vice

  20. 2025-06-20

    Appear Pro Hac Vice

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-08-21