PatentN.D. Cal.5:23-cv-03264

Entangled Media, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.

Summary

Entangled Media sues Dropbox for allegedly infringing its patent technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityAligned

Prior 0P · 2D · 1NRecent 30d 0P · 3D · 0N

Latest ruling: defendant (2023-04-12)

Press coverage and the latest court ruling tell the same story.

Coverage breakdown — the headlines behind the meter

0 plaintiff-favorable · 5 defendant-favorable · 1 neutral

Plaintiff-favorable

None classified yet.

Defendant-favorable

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2025-05-12 · coverage 0P / 1D / 0N2025-07-21 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1N2025-08-11 · coverage 0P / 1D / 0N2026-08-24 · coverage 0P / 3D / 0NDocketFiled 2023-06-302022-12-16 · filing · favors plaintiff DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Entangled Media, LLC. (cr5)2023-01-05 · ruling · favors defendant Text Order GRANTING 9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 9 Unopposed MOTION for E…2023-02-21 · ruling · favors defendant Text Order GRANTING 15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint entered by Judge…2023-04-12 · ruling · favors defendant Text Order GRANTING 20 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pi…Dec 22Oct 24Aug 26filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Docket no.
5:23-cv-03264
Nature of suit
Patent
Judge
P. Casey Pitts
Filed
2023-06-30
Last filing
2026-08-31

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Dropbox Inc. Entangled Media, LLC

Docket entries

  1. 2026-07-07

    No description on file

  2. 2026-07-06

    No description on file

  3. 2026-03-19

    No description on file

  4. 2026-03-11

    No description on file

  5. 2025-05-15

    No description on file

  6. 2025-04-15

    No description on file

  7. 2025-02-04

    No description on file

  8. 2025-01-14

    No description on file

  9. 2024-11-15

    No description on file

  10. 2024-09-12

    No description on file

  11. 2024-09-12

    No description on file

  12. 2024-05-16

    No description on file

  13. 2023-08-18

    No description on file

  14. 2023-04-12

    Text Order GRANTING 20 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of the lack of opposition and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before April 19, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc)

  15. 2023-03-20

    Text Order GRANTING 18 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before April 7, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file its reply on or before April 21, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc)

  16. 2023-02-21

    Reset Deadlines: Dropbox, Inc. answer due 3/10/2023. (dm)

  17. 2023-02-21

    Text Order GRANTING 15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint entered by Judge Robert Pitman. In light of the lack of opposition, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before March 10, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc)

  18. 2023-01-05

    Reset Deadlines: Dropbox, Inc. answer due 2/24/23. (dm)

  19. 2023-01-05

    Text Order GRANTING 9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint entered by Judge Robert Pitman. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before February 24, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lolc)

  20. 2022-12-16

    DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Entangled Media, LLC. (cr5)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-09-01