Masimo Corporation v. Apple Inc.
Summary
Masimo sues Apple for allegedly infringing patents on wearable health monitoring technology in smartwatches.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage vs realityPress: plaintiff
Coverage events: 108P · 55D · 35N
Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
108 plaintiff-favorable · 55 defendant-favorable · 35 neutral articles
Plaintiff-favorable
- Judge Sets Final Judgment in Masimo v. Apple, Affirming Masimo's $634 Million Win; It Appeals - strata-gee.comstrata-gee.com · 2026-07-24
- Apple fails to overturn $634 million patent verdict in Masimo lawsuitMacDailyNews · 2026-07-22
- Apple loses bid to overturn $634 million Masimo patent verdict, new trial also denied9to5Mac · 2026-07-21
- Apple's $634M payment to Masimo now set in stone after Judge tosses appealAppleInsider · 2026-07-21
Defendant-favorable
- Masimo Drops Customs Suit After ITC Backs Apple Watch RedesignBloomberg Law News · 2026-04-28
- Massimo's Apple Watch ban complaint dismissed by U.S. District CourtAppleInsider · 2026-04-25
- A Previously Banned Apple Watch Health Feature Is Now Here to StayCNET · 2026-04-22
- Apple defeats bid for new Apple Watch import ban at US trade tribunalThe Business Times · 2026-04-18
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
For the plaintiff
- Knobbe Martens Olson and Bear LLPBen Kaito Shiroma, Brian C. Horne, Douglas Bryant Wentzel +4 more
- Arnold and Porter Kaye Scholer LLPDavid C McMullen, Jerrit Yang, Matthew M Wolf +1 more
- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan, LLPSteven C. Cherny
- Sullivan & Cromwell, LLPAndrei Iancu
- Sullivan and Cromwell LLPDustin F Guzior
- Friedland Cianfrani LLPMatthew Thanh Pham
- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLPMatthew A. Traupman
For the defendant
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPAnnaleigh E. Curtis, Dominic E. Massa, James Bor-Zale +1 more
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Central District of California
- Docket no.
- 8:20-cv-00048
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- James V. Selna
- Filed
- 2020-01-09
- Last filing
- 2026-08-21
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Rockley Photonics Holdings, Ltd. Judge Andrew J. Guilford Apple Inc. Cercacor Laboratories, Inc. Masimo Corporation