PatentTXED2:24-cv-00752

Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc. v. HP Inc.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

Wilus Institute sues HP, Samsung, and Askey for patent infringement in federal court.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityPress: defendant

Coverage events: 1P · 2D · 1N (4 articles)

Latest ruling: defendant (2024-09-20)

Press coverage leans defendant-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

1 plaintiff-favorable · 2 defendant-favorable · 1 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 1 plaintiff · 2 defendant · 1 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2025-02-17 · coverage 0P / 1D / 0N2025-11-17 · coverage 0P / 1D / 0N2026-02-16 · coverage 1P / 0D / 0N2026-03-23 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1NDocketFiled 2024-09-132024-09-20 · ruling · favors defendant Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is gra…Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
  • Independent counselRiley James Green
Other counsel (amici, etc.)
Court
TXED
Docket no.
2:24-cv-00752
Nature of suit
Patent
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap
Filed
2024-09-13
Last filing
2026-08-20

Cause

28:1331 Fed. Question

Entities in this case

Parties

Wilus Institute of Standards and Technology Inc., (plaintiff) HP Inc. (defendant) Michael D. Paul (technical advisor) David Folsom (mediator) Askey International Corp., (consol defendant) Askey Computer Corp., (consol defendant) Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., (consol defendant) Samsung Electronics America, Inc., (consol defendant) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (consol defendant)

Docket entries

  1. 2026-03-26

    FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document 385 and 386, REDACTION. PLEASE IGNORE. (NKL)

  2. 2026-03-17

    FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document 311, SEALED RESPONSE. PLEASE IGNORE. (NKL)

  3. 2026-03-03

    No description on file

  4. 2025-12-10

    No description on file

  5. 2025-12-10

    NOTICE of Hearing: Markman/Claim Construction Hearing set for 12/16/2025 at 10:00 AM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. NOTE: ONLY THE TIME HAS CHANGED. (aeb)

  6. 2025-07-24

    FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document 138, REPLY to Response. PLEASE IGNORE. (NKL)

  7. 2025-03-27

    No description on file

  8. 2025-02-19

    No description on file

  9. 2025-02-19

    NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference RESET for 4/29/2026 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (bga)

  10. 2025-01-16

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)

  11. 2025-01-02

    ***FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document # 51, UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DISPUTED PROTECTIVE ORDER. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (NKL)

  12. 2025-01-02

    FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document 51, UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DISPUTED PROTECTIVE ORDER. PLEASE IGNORE. (NKL)

  13. 2024-12-16

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)

  14. 2024-12-16

    FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document 36, ANSWER. PLEASE IGNORE. (NKL)

  15. 2024-11-14

    No description on file

  16. 2024-11-07

    Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap (Lead 2:24-cv-752 and Members 2:24-cv-746, 2:24-cv-764, 2:24-cv-765 and 2:24-cv-766): Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference held on 11/7/2024 from 01:35 PM - 02:49 PM. Counsel for the parties appeared. Court asked whether the parties consented to trial before the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Court proceeded to provide counsel with Claim Construction and Jury Selection/Trial dates. (Court Reporter - Shawn McRoberts) (aeb)

  17. 2024-09-20

    Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for HP Inc. to 11/22/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(NKL)

  18. 2024-09-13

    No description on file

  19. 2024-09-13

    No description on file

  20. 2024-09-13

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (CH)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-08-20