Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

Summary

Velocity Communication Technologies sues OnePlus and major tech companies for patent infringement involving wireless communication technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC (plaintiff) OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (defendant) Lianyue (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. (consol defendant) Lianzhou Technologies Co., Ltd. (consol defendant) TP-Link Corporation Ltd (consol defendant) TP-Link Corporation PTE. Ltd. (consol defendant) LG Electronics USA, Inc. (consol defendant) LG Electronics, Inc. (consol defendant) Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility Technologies Communication Company Limited (consol defendant) Motorola Mobile Communication Technology Ltd. (consol defendant) Lenovo PC HK Limited (consol defendant) Lenovo Group Limited (consol defendant) Juniper Networks, Inc. (consol defendant) Aruba Networks, LLC (consol defendant) Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (consol defendant) HP, Inc. (consol defendant) Cisco Systems, Inc. (consol defendant) ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. (consol defendant) Acer, Inc. (consol defendant) David Folsom (mediator)

Docket entries

1. #1572026-07-08

   Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120)

2. #1562026-07-08

   Order Dismissing Case AND ~Util - Terminate Motions

3. #1552026-06-22

   Dismiss

4. #1542026-06-22

   Dismiss

5. #1532026-06-18

   Order

6. #1522026-06-18

   Dismiss

7. #1512026-06-18

   Dismiss

8. #1502026-06-18

   Dismiss

9. #1492026-06-17

   Dismiss

10. #1482026-06-17

    Dismiss

11. #1472026-06-17

    Dismiss

12. #1462026-06-17

    Dismiss

13. #1452026-06-10

    Order AND ~Util - Terminate Motions

14. #1442026-06-09

    Miscellaneous Relief

15. #1432026-05-12

    ORDER granting [142] Renewed Joint Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement. The Court hereby STAYS all deadlines for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If the matter has not been dismissed before the expiration of the stay, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer and file a joint status update. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 5/12/2026. (slo)

16. #1422026-05-05

    JOINT MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement (Renewed) by ASUSTeK Computer, Inc., Acer, Inc., Aruba Networks, LLC, Cisco Systems, Inc., HP, Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Juniper Networks, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, Lenovo PC HK Limited, Lianyue (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., Lianzhou Technologies Co., Ltd., Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility Technologies Communication Company Limited, Motorola Mobile Communication Technology Ltd., TP-Link Corporation Ltd, TP-Link Corporation PTE. Ltd., Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order)(Hipskind, Daniel)

17. 2026-01-26

    TEXT ORDER granting 36 Motion to Continue. The hearing set for January 27, 2026 is continued until further order of the COURT. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III on 1/26/26. (smc)

18. 2026-01-26

    *** Deadlines and Hearings terminated. The hearing set for January 26, 2027 is CANCELLED. (smc)

19. 2025-07-09

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo)

20. 2025-07-09

    Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.