CopyrightS.D.N.Y.1:25-cv-06810

Polaris Images Corp. v. Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.

Summary

Polaris Images sues Warner Bros. Discovery for copyright infringement over allegedly unauthorized use of its images.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Docket no.
1:25-cv-06810
Nature of suit
Copyright
Filed
2025-08-18
Last filing
2026-05-28

Cause

17:501 Copyright Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. Polaris Images Corp.

Docket entries

  1. #312026-07-06

    Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal

  2. #302026-05-29

    Order on Motion for Extension of Time

  3. #292026-05-28

    Extension of Time

  4. #282026-04-30

    ORDER granting 27 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 4/30/2026) (tg)

  5. #272026-04-29

    Extension of Time to File Document

  6. #252026-03-30

    Order on Motion for Extension of Time

  7. #242026-03-27

    Extension of Time

  8. #232026-01-28

    AO 121 Form Copyright - Case Terminated - Submitted

  9. #222026-01-27

    ORDER OF DISMISSAL... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settl ement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by March 30, 2026. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 1/27/26) (yv)

  10. #212026-01-27

    Continue

  11. 2026-01-14

    Mediation Conference Scheduled

  12. 2025-12-15

    Notice of Mediator Assignment

  13. #202025-12-12

    Mediation Referral Order

  14. #192025-12-12

    Case Management Plan

  15. #182025-12-12

    ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the Parties' Joint Letter and Proposed Case Management Plan, [ECF No. 17]. Having reviewed those materials, the Court orders that the Initial Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for Decembe r 17, 2025, at 11:30 AM, is hereby ADJOURNED sine die. Separately, the Court will enter an endorsed version of the Proposed Case Management Plan and refer this matter to the Court-Annexed Mediation Program for mediation. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 12/12/2025) (tg)

  16. #172025-12-10

    Letter

  17. 2025-08-19

    Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice

  18. 2025-08-19

    Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)

  19. 2025-08-19

    Case Designated ECF. (vf)

  20. 2025-08-19

    CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-29