Warner Bros

InnoBrilliance sues Warner Bros. Discovery for allegedly infringing its patent technology.

HomeVestors sues Warner Bros. Discovery for trademark infringement over allegedly infringing use of HomeVestors' marks.

Warner Bros. is suing 19 defendants—mostly Chinese sellers and online marketplaces—for trademark infringement. The defendants allegedly used Warner Bros. marks on counterfeit or knockoff merchandise sold through platforms like Amazon and social media, infringing the studio's iconic intellectual property without authorization.

Warner Bros. sues partnerships and unincorporated associations for trademark infringement.

Warner Bros. Entertainment is suing multiple partnerships and unincorporated associations for trademark infringement. The case targets defendants identified on Schedule A for allegedly infringing Warner Bros.' trademarks, though the specific marks at issue aren't disclosed in the case caption. The suit seeks to protect Warner Bros.' intellectual property rights and likely damages.

Warner Bros. sues multiple online sellers for trademark infringement involving counterfeit merchandise.

Production Pit sues Warner Bros and major retailers for copyright infringement over unspecified creative work.

Watchdog AI and Joseph Rayhbuck sued Warner Bros. Discovery for copyright infringement. The specific work or creative content at issue is not identified in the case record, but the lawsuit concerns alleged unauthorized copying or use of copyrighted material.

Warner Bros. Entertainment is suing multiple partnerships and unincorporated associations for trademark infringement. The case targets defendants identified on Schedule A who allegedly used Warner Bros.' protected marks without authorization, threatening the studio's brand identity and market control.

Quantion LLC sues Warner Bros. for patent infringement related to entertainment technology.

Polaris Images sues Warner Bros. Discovery for copyright infringement over allegedly unauthorized use of its images.

Nokia Technologies sues Warner Bros. for patent infringement related to entertainment technology.

Warner Bros. is suing over two dozen online sellers and marketers for trademark infringement, alleging they're hawking counterfeit merchandise—including knockoff candles, cosplay costumes, phone cases, and crafts—bearing Warner Bros.' protected marks without authorization. The defendants, mostly China-based vendors operating under names like Ode Candles, FAKIMI, and YESCOSPLAY, allegedly sold infringing goods through e-commerce platforms. Warner Bros. is seeking to stop the sales and recover damages.

Warner Bros. Discovery sues Calise Partners over trademark infringement in federal court motion to compel discovery.

Michael Mosher sues Warner Bros. Pictures for allegedly copying his copyrighted work without permission.

Gerald Brittle and Chad Hayes sued Warner Bros. Entertainment and James Wan over copyright infringement related to a work involving New Line Productions and James Wan Productions. The case centers on alleged unauthorized use of copyrighted material in connection with film production, with multiple defendants including director James Wan, screenwriters Gary Dauberman and David Leslie Johnson, and production companies Atomic Monster and Ratpac-Dune Entertainment.

DC Comics, Warner Bros, and the Siegel heirs are suing over Superman copyright ownership. The case centers on whether the Siegels retain rights to the Superman character created by Joe Shuster and Jerry Siegel, challenging Warner Bros' control of the iconic superhero.

FastVDO sued Warner Bros. for infringing its video delivery patent technology.

Warner Bros and partners sued Global Asylum for trademark infringement over allegedly confusing brand use.

Michael Alan Rubin sues Warner Bros Entertainment and multiple filmmakers—including directors Todd Phillips and Craig Mazin, screenwriter Scot Armstrong, and producers Stephen Bing and Daniel Goldberg—for copyright infringement. The lawsuit centers on alleged unauthorized use of Rubin's creative work in connection with film and television projects developed by the defendants and their production company Legendary Pictures.