Nokia Technologies Oy v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Summary
Nokia Technologies sues Warner Bros. for patent infringement related to entertainment technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage events: 3P · 3D · 10N (30 articles)
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
6 plaintiff-favorable · 3 defendant-favorable · 21 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 3 plaintiff · 3 defendant · 10 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
- Innovation leadership drives Nokia’s patent licensing progress in 2026Nokia · 2026-06-11
- Warner Bros. Fails to Nix Three Nokia Streaming Tech Patentsnews.bloombergtax.com · 2026-03-06
- Warner Bros. Fails to Nix Three Nokia Streaming Tech Patentsnews.bloombergtax.com · 2026-03-06
- Warner Bros. Fails to Nix Three Nokia Streaming Tech Patentsnews.bloombergtax.com · 2026-03-06
- On the way to a global FRAND rate: Nokia drops claims against Warner and ParamountJUVE Patent · 2026-04-13
- Warner Bros. Hits Nokia With Antitrust Claims In Patent CaseLaw360 · 2026-01-07
- US firms secure Asian implementers interim licence against Nokia in the UKJUVE Patent · 2025-12-23
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Independent counselErik B Fountain, James Quigley, Joshua Budwin +2 more
- Farnan LLPBrian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan
- Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLPJennifer Ying
- Court
- DED
- Docket no.
- 1:25-cv-01337
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2025-11-01
- Last filing
- 2026-03-20
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Docket entries
- #322026-03-20
No description on file
- 2026-03-06
SO ORDERED, re 29 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to (i) Submit Proposed Scheduling Order and (ii) Respond to Counterclaims to (i) April 9, 2026 and (ii) May 8, 2026 filed by Nokia Technologies Oy. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 3/6/2026. (lnb)
- 2026-03-06
No description on file
- 2026-03-06
No description on file
- 2026-02-09
No description on file
- 2026-01-12
No description on file
- 2026-01-12
SO ORDERED, re 19 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (i) for Plaintiff to file its answering brief in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and (ii) for Defendants to file their reply brief in support of their Motion to Dismiss to (i) 2/3/2026 and (ii) 2/17/2026 filed by Nokia Technologies Oy. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 1/12/26. (jaa)
- 2025-11-20
Reset Briefing Schedule: Answering Brief due 1/5/2026. (lnb)
- 2025-11-20
SO ORDERED, re 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Complaint (D.I. 1) is hereby extended through and including January 5, 2026 to January 5, 2026 filed by Home Box Office, Inc., Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc., Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/20/2025. (lnb)
- 2025-11-20
No description on file
- 2025-11-20
No description on file
- 2025-11-20
No description on file
- 2025-11-10
No description on file
- 2025-11-10
No description on file
- 2025-11-10
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Joshua Budwin, Erik B Fountain, Warren H. Lipschitz, James Quigley & R. Mitch Verboncoeur for Nokia Technologies Oy added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)
- 2025-11-06
No description on file
- 2025-11-06
SO ORDERED, re 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Erik B. Fountain, James E. Quigley, R. Mitch Verboncoeur, Warren Lipschitz, and Joshua Budwin filed by Nokia Technologies Oy. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/6/2025. (lnb)
- 2025-11-05
No description on file
- 2025-11-05
No description on file
- 2025-11-05
Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.