Brittle v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Summary
Gerald Brittle and Chad Hayes sued Warner Bros. Entertainment and James Wan over copyright infringement related to a work involving New Line Productions and James Wan Productions. The case centers on alleged unauthorized use of copyrighted material in connection with film production, with multiple defendants including director James Wan, screenwriters Gary Dauberman and David Leslie Johnson, and production companies Atomic Monster and Ratpac-Dune Entertainment.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage events: 2P · 3D · 3N (11 articles)
Press coverage leans defendant-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
3 plaintiff-favorable · 3 defendant-favorable · 5 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 2 plaintiff · 3 defendant · 3 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
- Judge Allows $900 Million ‘Conjuring’ Lawsuit Against Warner Bros.The Hollywood Reporter · 2017-08-28
- Warner Bros haunted by 'true story' marketing of The Conjuring as $900m copyright lawsuit gives chaseThe Drum · 2017-04-07
- Warner Bros. might have to pay $900 million if it can't prove ghosts are realBusiness Insider · 2017-04-06
- Warner Bros. being sued because the Conjuring movies aren’t based on real factsAV Club · 2018-05-18
- Warner Bros Throws Shade On $1B ‘Conjuring’ Suit; 2018 Trial Penciled In – UpdateDeadline · 2017-08-29
- Warner Bros. Asks Court to Ghost $900 Million ‘Conjuring’ LawsuitThe Hollywood Reporter · 2017-06-22
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Marrs & HenryBradley Phipps Marrs, Patrick Cullen Henry , II
- Vincent L. Robertson Sr. Esq. PLCVincent L. Robertson , Sr.
- Goodman Allen Donnelly PLLC (Glen Allen)Joseph Ray Pope
- Kelley Drye & Warren LLP (NA-CA)Michael John O'Connor
- Lowe & Associates, P.C. (CA-NA)Steven T. Lowe
- O'Melveny & Myers (West LA-NA)Lauren Rakow, Matthew Kline
- Woods Rogers PLC (Roanoke)John Benjamin Rottenborn
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP (DC-NA)Laura Lorenz
- Independent counselTony Derosa-Grund
- Court
- VAED
- Docket no.
- 3:16-cv-00908
- Nature of suit
- Copyright
- Filed
- 2016-11-11
- Last filing
- 2018-03-02
Cause
17:101 Copyright Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Gerald Brittle (plaintiff) Chad Hayes (plaintiff) New Line Productions, Inc. (plaintiff) Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (plaintiff) Does 1 to 10, inclusive (defendant) Gary Dauberman (defendant) David Leslie Johnson (defendant) Atomic Monster Incorporated (defendant) James Wan Productions, Inc. (defendant) James Wan (defendant) Ratpac-Dune Entertainment LLC (defendant) Carey Hayes (defendant) Time Warner Inc. (defendant) Tony Derosa-Grund (interested party) Global Access LLC (counter defendant)
Docket entries
- #1502018-03-02
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 03/02/2018. (tjoh, ) (Entered: 03/02/2018)
- 2018-02-02
Add and Terminate Attorneys
- 2018-02-02
*** Attorney Vincent L. Robertson, Sr terminated. Set Hearing: Show Cause Hearing set for 2/15/2018 12:00 PM in Richmond Courtroom 6000 before District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (wtuc)
- 2018-01-19
Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings
- 2018-01-19
Set as to 127 Emergency MOTION to Compel: Motion Hearing set for 2/2/2018 at 11:00 AM in Richmond Courtroom 6000 before District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (wtuc)
- 2018-01-16
Notice of Correction
- 2018-01-16
Notice of Correction re 125 First MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Gerald Brittle. Attorney notified to file the Certificate of Service as a separate document. (jsmi, )
- 2018-01-11
Set Deadlines/Hearings
- 2018-01-11
Settlement Conference set for 3/2/2018 at 09:30 AM in Richmond Judges Chamber before Magistrate Judge David J. Novak. (cgar)
- 2017-12-20
Set as to 102 Second MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (b) Motion to Clarify Court Order of 11/22/17, (c) Motion to enter stipulated protective order, (d) Motion to Allow manual filing by Lowe|LeFan (filed solely on behalf of Lowe|Lefan), 92 First MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney For Gerald Brittle & Global Access, LLC: Motion Hearing set for 1/9/2018 at 11:00 AM in Richmond Courtroom 6000 before District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (wtuc)
- 2017-12-04
Set Hearing: Status Hearing set for 12/5/2017 at 09:30 AM in Richmond Courtroom 6000 before District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (wtuc)
- 2017-12-01
Conference Call set for 12/4/2017 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge David J. Novak. (cgar)
- 2017-11-30
Settlement Conference set for 12/11/2017 at 09:30 AM in Richmond Courtroom 5400 before Magistrate Judge David J. Novak. (cgar)
- 2017-11-22
Case referred to Magistrate Judge David J. Novak. (jsmi, )
- 2017-11-09
Set as to 77 MOTION to Compel Regarding the Sufficiency of Plaintiff's Answers and Objections to Defendants' Requests for Admission, 81 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses: Motion Hearing set for 11/21/2017 at 02:00 PM in Richmond Courtroom 6000 before District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (wtuc)
- 2017-07-27
Set/Reset Hearings as to 44 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(6), 46 Motion to Stay, and 49 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, and Failure to State a Claim: Motion Hearing reset for 8/22/2017 at 8:15 AM in Richmond Courtroom 6000 before District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (rpiz)
- 2017-07-25
Notice of Correction re 58 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing attorney notified only application is necessary for filing. No motion or proposed order needs to be prepared. (jsmi, )
- 2017-07-14
Set as to 46 MOTION to Stay 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, and Failure to State a Claim, 44 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: Motion Hearing set for 8/4/2017 at 01:30 PM in Richmond Courtroom 6000 before District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (wtuc)
- 2017-04-26
Notice of Correction re 26 Request for Entry of Default. Filing attorney notified to return summons to Clerk for filing and setting of answer date. (jsmi, )
- 2017-03-30
Flash drive of exhibits referenced in Amended Complaint received from Plaintiff's attorney. Placed in brown expandable on Clerk's Office shelf. (jsmi, )
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.