Ericsson Inc. v. D-Link Corporation
Summary
Ericsson and Belkin sued D-Link, Toshiba, Dell, Gateway, Acer, Netgear, and Intel for infringing wireless networking patents. The case involves patent claims under 35 U.S.C. § 271 across multiple consumer electronics manufacturers, with the specific patent technology and accused products not identified in the case record.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: defendant (2011-06-24)
Counsel of record
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPAshley N. Moore
- Caldwell Cassady & Curry, PCAustin Curry
- Foley & Lardner - WashingtonLiane M Peterson, Pavan K Agarwal
- Kirkland & Ellis, LLP - NYCGregory S Arovas, Oliver Bennett
- Kirkland & Ellis - San FranciscoJared D Edgar, John Richard Edwards
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP - Los AngelesMichael Woodrow De Vries, Tim Majors
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPLuke L Dauchot
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP - CaliforniaAdam R Alper
- Potter Minton, a Professional CorporationJohn Frederick Bufe
- Baker Botts LLP Palo AltoJeremy John Taylor
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP - San FranciscoKevin Spark
- Allen Gardner Law, PLLCAllen Franklin Gardner
- Parker Bunt & AinsworthRobert Christopher Bunt
- Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C.Robert M Parker
- Perkins Coie LLP - San FranciscoSarah Elizabeth Piepmeier
- Potter MintonMichael E Jones
- Court
- TXED
- Docket no.
- 6:10-cv-00473
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Disposition
- judgment
- Filed
- 2010-09-14
- Last filing
- 2020-06-30
- Terminated
- 2020-06-30
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (plaintiff) Ericsson Inc. (plaintiff) Belkin International, Inc. (plaintiff) Toshiba Corporation (defendant) Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. (defendant) Dell, Inc. (defendant) Gateway, Inc. (defendant) Acer America Corporation (defendant) Acer, Inc. (defendant) Netgear, Inc. (defendant) D-Link Systems, Inc. (defendant) Toshiba America Consumer Products, LLC., (defendant) D-Link Corporation (defendant) Toshiba America, Inc. (defendant) Intel Corporation (counter defendant) Gale R Peterson (technical advisor) David Folsom (mediator) Robert W Faulkner (mediator)
Docket entries
- 2014-08-21
Supersedeas bond posted by Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. per order dated 10/10/2013. (dlk)
- 2014-05-28
Registry Funds Received from D-Link Systems, Inc. (mjc, )
- 2014-02-18
Registry Funds Received from D-Link Systems, Inc.(gsg) Modified on 2/18/2014 (dlk).
- 2013-09-06
Transmission of 624 Notice of Appeal, 625 Notice of Appeal, 627 Notice of Appeal, 616 Final Judgment, 615 Memorandum, 454 Order, {524] Memorandum, and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit by separate email. re 627 Notice of Appeal - FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 625 Notice of Appeal - FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 624 Notice of Appeal - FEDERAL CIRCUIT, (dlc, )
- 2013-07-05
NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the Sealed Document submitted, entry 554 . Incorrect Docket Event. (gsg)
- 2013-07-01
***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 537 Proposed Findings of Fact. PLEASE IGNORE. TO BE REFILED AS A MOTION.*** (mjc, )
- 2013-04-09
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 371 SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,987,019 and 6,466,568, 301 SEALED MOTION for Leave to File Dell's Second Amended Answer, Defenses and Counterclaims : Motion Hearing set for 5/9/2013 09:30 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. (cwk)
- 2012-06-18
NOTICE of Hearing: Markman Hearing set for 6/28/2012 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge Leonard Davis is RESCHEDULED to 6/27/2012 at 10:00 AM in Ctrm 6 (Beaumont) before Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin. (sal)
- 2012-04-17
NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the Attorney Appearance submitted, entry 186 . No certificate of service. Attorney to refile. (gsg)
- 2011-09-01
NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the 124 Motion for Joinder, 126 and 127 Sealed Documents submitted by Belkin International, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation. Document does not contain a Certificate of Authorization to File Under Seal and 126 and 127 should be filed as Sealed Additional Attachments to Main Document. Correction should be made by one business day. (mjc, )
- 2011-07-14
CASE REFERRED to Mediator. Robert Faulkner is appointed as Mediator in this cause. (mll, )
- 2011-07-14
Deadlines set per 102 Docket Control Order: Amended Pleadings due by 4/12/2012; Respond to Amended Pleadings by 4-26-2012. Discovery due by 9/28/2012. Expert Witness List due by 10/29/2012; Rebuttal expert witnesses designated by 12-07-2012. Identify trial witnesses by 1/25/2013; Rebuttal Trial Witnesses identified by 2-05-2013. Joinder of Parties due by 12/9/2011, for defts. Jury instructions due by 3/29/2013. Mediation Completion due by 12/14/2012. Robert Faulkner is appointed as Mediator in this cause. Dispositive Motions due by 3/5/2013; Response to Dispositive Motions due 3-19-2013. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 3/29/2013. Jury Selection set for 6/3/2013 09:00AM before Judge Leonard Davis. Jury Trial set for 6/10/2013 09:00 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. Markman Hearing set for 6/28/2012 09:30 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. Pretrial Conference set for 5/23/2013 09:00 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. Expected Length of Trial is 10 days. (mll, )
- 2011-06-24
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 85 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Dell, Inc. to 8/1/2011. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2011-06-17
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 82 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Belkin International, Inc. to 8/1/2011. 32 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2010-11-16
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 30 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for D-Link Systems, Inc. to 12/2/2010. 14 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2010-10-20
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 21 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Acer America Corporation to 12/3/2010. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension. (Filed by pltf on behalf of deft. Pltf requested 60 days; Local Rule CV-12 limits the extension to 45 days.)( mll, )
- 2010-10-20
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 20 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Gateway, Inc. to 12/3/2010. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension. (Filed by pltf on behalf of deft. Pltf requested 60 days; Local Rule CV-12 limits this extension to 45 days.) ( mll, )
- 2010-10-15
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 19 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Netgear, Inc. to 12/2/2010. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2010-10-15
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 18 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for D-Link Systems, Inc. to 11/18/2010. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2010-09-14
Judge Leonard Davis added. (mll, )
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.