Potter Minton

Counsel of record in 35 federal IP lawsuits tracked by IP Feed.

1 for plaintiffs27 for defendants
  1. Openfor defendantTXED2026-10-19
    Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd v. Samsung Display Co. Ltd.

    Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics is suing Samsung Display, Best Buy, and Walmart over a patent infringement claim related to semiconductor display technology. The case involves allegations that the defendants are infringing patents covering display technology used in consumer electronics. Multiple China Star entities and TCL subsidiaries are named as counter-defendants, suggesting a complex dispute over display panel manufacturing and licensing rights.

  2. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2026-10-16
    University of Souhern California v. Google LLC

    University of Southern California is suing Google LLC for patent infringement in federal court. The lawsuit concerns a patent that USC claims Google has infringed, though the specific patent technology is not identified in the case record. The case is proceeding in the Northern District of California.

  3. OpenTXED2026-10-14
    In Re: Valtrus Innovations Ltd

    Valtrus Innovations Ltd is suing multiple data center and infrastructure companies—including Ark Data Centers, TRG Datacenters, 365 Data Center Services, Compass Datacenters, Cogent Communications, and others—for patent infringement in federal court in Texas. The specific patent at issue is not identified in the case record, but the lawsuit alleges these defendants unlawfully used Valtrus's patented technology.

  4. Openfor defendantTXED2026-10-13
    Privakey, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

    Privakey sues Cisco for infringing its patents in a patent infringement dispute.

  5. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2026-10-12
    AlmondNet, Inc. v. Adobe Inc.

    AlmondNet and Intent IQ are suing Adobe for patent infringement. The plaintiffs allege Adobe has violated one or more patents, though the specific patent numbers and technical scope are not disclosed in the available case information. The case was filed in the Northern District of California.

  6. Openfor defendantTXED2026-09-30
    Whirlpool Corporation v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

    Whirlpool sued Samsung Electronics in federal court over patent infringement. The case involves a patent related to appliance technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas. Whirlpool alleges Samsung unlawfully used patented technology in its products without authorization.

  7. Openfor defendantTXED2026-09-22
    Edge Networking Systems LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

    Edge Networking Systems sues Amazon for patent infringement related to networking technology.

  8. OpenTXND2026-09-21
    Innovation Sciences LLC v. MGM Security Services Inc

    Innovation Sciences sues MGM Security Services for allegedly infringing its patent technology.

  9. Openfor defendantTXED2026-09-09
    Headwater Research LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc.

    Headwater Research sues Charter, Comcast, and Dish for infringing its patents in broadband and wireless services.

  10. OpenTXED2026-09-08
    Headwater Research LLC v. Dish Network Corp.

    Headwater Research sues Comcast, Charter, and Dish for patent infringement over wireless and cable technology.

  11. OpenTXED2026-08-31
    Headwater Research LLC v. Dish Network Corp.

    Headwater Research sues Comcast, Charter, and Dish for patent infringement over streaming and wireless technology.

  12. Openfor defendantTXED2026-08-18
    Telcom Ventures LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

    Telcom Ventures sues Samsung for infringing its patent technology in electronics.

  13. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2026-05-04
    EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google LLC

    EcoFactor is suing Google for patent infringement. The case involves a patent owned by EcoFactor, with Reliant Energy Retail Services listed as an interested party. The specific patent and technology at issue are not identified in the available case information.

  14. OpenTXED2025-12-19
    Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Wingstop Inc.

    Fall Line Patents sues major restaurant chains including Wingstop, IHOP, Applebee's, and Domino's for patent infringement.

  15. Closedfor defendantTXED2025-12-05
    Quantion LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

    Quantion LLC sued Cisco Systems for infringing its patent technology.

  16. Openfor defendantTXED2025-10-10
    Intercurrency Software LLC v. Binance Holdings, Ltd.

    Intercurrency Software sues Binance for patent infringement in federal court.

  17. Openfor defendantTXED2025-06-26
    Nariste Networks Pty. Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

    Nariste Networks sues Samsung for infringing its patents in electronic devices and technology.

  18. Closedfor defendantTXED2025-05-30
    Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Valve Corporation

    Symbology Innovations is suing Valve Corporation and Gearbox Software for patent infringement in federal court in Texas. The lawsuit centers on a patent in Symbology's portfolio, though the specific patent number and technology aren't detailed in the case record. The suit targets the defendants' use of the patented technology.

  19. Openfor defendantTXED2025-05-16
    Portsmouth Network Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

    Portsmouth Network Corporation sues Cisco Systems for infringing its patents related to network technology.

  20. Closedfor defendantTXED2025-01-31
    Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC v. Valve Corporation

    Quantum Technology Innovations sues Valve Corporation for allegedly infringing its patent technology.

  21. Closedfor defendantTXED2024-08-20
    Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC v. Valve Corporation

    Social Positioning Input Systems sues Valve for allegedly infringing its patent technology in gaming products.

  22. Closedfor defendantTXED2024-04-29
    Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Altice USA, Inc.

    Touchstream Technologies sues Altice USA and cable companies for patent infringement related to streaming technology.

  23. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2023-11-30
    Jenam Tech, LLC v. Google LLC

    Jenam Tech sued Google for patent infringement in federal court.

  24. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2023-11-30
    Jenam Tech, LLC v. Google, LLC

    Jenam Tech sues Google for allegedly infringing its patent technology.

  25. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2023-06-07
    VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

    Voip-Pal sues Meta and WhatsApp for infringing its VoIP communication patents.

  26. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2023-06-07
    VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

    VoIP-Pal.com is suing Meta Platforms and WhatsApp over patent infringement, alleging the defendants use technology covered by VoIP-Pal's patents. The case involves patents related to VoIP (voice-over-internet-protocol) functionality, likely covering features in WhatsApp's calling and messaging services. Google is listed as an interested party in the Northern District of California dispute.

  27. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2023-06-07
    Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

    Voip-Pal sues Google and Meta for infringing its VoIP communication patents.

  28. Openfor defendantN.D. Cal.2022-06-17
    Trenchant Blade Technologies LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

    Trenchant Blade Technologies sues Samsung for allegedly infringing its patents in semiconductor technology.

  29. Closedfor defendantTXED2022-06-07
    Vocalife LLC v. Harman International Industries Inc.

    Vocalife LLC is suing Harman International Industries and Google over patent infringement. The lawsuit targets technology related to voice or vocal processing—Vocalife's core IP area—allegedly used without permission in Harman's or Google's products or services. The case centers on whether Harman and Google unlawfully incorporated Vocalife's patented vocal technology.

  30. Closedfor defendantTXED2022-05-16
    Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Google LLC

    Uniloc 2017 LLC and Uniloc USA, Inc. are suing Google LLC for patent infringement in federal court. The case involves a patent dispute, though the specific patent number and technology at issue are not identified in the case record. The litigation includes intervention by the Public Interest Patent Law Institute and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

  31. ClosedTXED2020-06-30
    Ericsson Inc. v. D-Link Corporation

    Ericsson and Belkin sued D-Link, Toshiba, Dell, Gateway, Acer, Netgear, and Intel for infringing wireless networking patents. The case involves patent claims under 35 U.S.C. § 271 across multiple consumer electronics manufacturers, with the specific patent technology and accused products not identified in the case record.

  32. Closedfor plaintiffTXED2016-11-30
    Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

    Commil USA, Symbol Technologies, and Motorola sued Cisco Systems over patent infringement. The case involves a patent related to wireless networking or communications technology. The lawsuit seeks damages for Cisco's alleged unauthorized use of the patented technology.

  33. ClosedTXED2016-05-16
    BSG Tech LLC v. American Musical Supply, Inc.

    BSG Tech LLC sued American Musical Supply and numerous e-commerce defendants including Wayfair, Wine.com, and eBags for patent infringement. The case involves a patent allegedly infringed by these retailers' operations, with multiple defendants consolidated. The specific patent technology and its application to the defendants' businesses are central to the dispute.

  34. Closedfor defendantTXED2016-03-07
    Loramax LLC v. American Century Proprietary Holdings Inc.

    Loramax sues investment fund managers for patent infringement across financial services distribution.

  35. Closedfor defendantTXED2012-01-20
    Hopewell Culture & Design, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated

    Hopewell Culture & Design sued Adobe Systems and multiple smartphone manufacturers including Samsung, Apple, HTC, Motorola, LG, Nokia, and Palm over patent infringement. The case involves a patent related to mobile device or software technology, with numerous consumer electronics companies named as defendants alongside Adobe.

Counsel sourced from public CourtListener docket records; firm names are normalized across spellings and office locations. Appearing for a party is not an endorsement of any position.