PatentN.D. Cal.4:26-cv-08067

AlmondNet, Inc. v. Adobe Inc.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

AlmondNet and Intent IQ are suing Adobe for patent infringement. The plaintiffs allege Adobe has violated one or more patents, though the specific patent numbers and technical scope are not disclosed in the available case information. The case was filed in the Northern District of California.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Docket no.
4:26-cv-08067
Nature of suit
Patent
Judge
Trina L. Thompson
Filed
2026-08-04
Last filing
2026-08-24

Cause

15:1126 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Intent IQ, LLC (plaintiff) AlmondNet, Inc. (plaintiff) Adobe Inc. (defendant)

Docket entries

  1. #612026-08-24

    ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Judge Trina L Thompson. Judge James Donato no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the updated judicial initials immediately after the case number. Counsel are reminded to verify the location of the judge on the court website. All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also remain unchanged. Mark B. Busby Clerk, United States District Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tke, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2026) (Entered: 08/24/2026)

  2. #602026-08-24

    RELATED CASE ORDER (Related cases: 3:26-cv-08062-TLT). Signed by Judge Trina L. Thompson on 8/24/2026. (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 8/24/2026) (Entered: 08/24/2026)

  3. 2026-08-24

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

  4. #592026-08-21

    NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-12 by Adobe Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Swisher, Jonathan) (Filed on 8/21/2026) Modified on 8/24/2026 (anj, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/21/2026)

  5. #582026-08-19

    CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/10/2026 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 12/3/2026. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/19/2026. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2026) (Entered: 08/19/2026)

  6. #572026-08-18

    ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned using a proportionate, random and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato. Magistrate Judge Ajay S. Krishnan no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the updated judicial initials immediately after the case number. Counsel are reminded to verify the location of the judge on the court website. All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also remain unchanged. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Mark B. Busby Clerk, United States District Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dso, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2026) (Entered: 08/18/2026)

  7. 2026-08-18

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

  8. #562026-08-17

    CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (kmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2026) (Entered: 08/17/2026)

  9. 2026-08-17

    Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

  10. #552026-08-14

    STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT filed by Adobe Inc.. (Casamiquela, Ryan) (Filed on 8/14/2026) (Entered: 08/14/2026)

  11. #542026-08-14

    Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Adobe Inc. (Adobe's Rule 71 Disclosure and Certification of Conflicts and Interested Entities or Persons) (Lee, Nicholas) (Filed on 8/14/2026) (Entered: 08/14/2026)

  12. 2026-08-14

    Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

  13. 2026-06-22

    Text Order GRANTING 42 Mark Raftrey's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice Pro Hac Vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our Court within 10 days of this Order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. It is further ORDERED that if counsel has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2). It is so ORDERED. Entered by Judge David Counts. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (db)

  14. 2026-05-05

    Text Order GRANTING 35 Motion. It is ORDERED that the plaintiffs, AlmondNet Inc. and Intent IQ, LLC, shall respond to the defendant's motion to transfer (Dkt. No. 28) on or before May 21, 2026, and the defendant shall file its Reply on or before June 11, 2026. Entered by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (CWlc)

  15. 2026-04-20

    Text Order GRANTING 33 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. The deadline for the defendant's reply to the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 30) is extended up to and including May 4, 2026. Entered by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (CWlc)

  16. 2026-03-24

    Text Order GRANTING 31 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. It is ORDERED that the plaintiffs, AlmondNet, Inc. and Intent IQ, LLC, shall respond to the defendant's motion to dismiss on or before April 13, 2026. Entered by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (CWlc)

  17. 2026-03-10

    Text Order MOOTING 13 Motion to Dismiss in light of the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 24). Entered by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (CWlc)

  18. 2026-01-15

    DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re 25 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 24 Amended Complaint, : Proposed Order has incorrect case number. Please correct and refile. This motion will not be forwarded to the assigned judge for consideration and will be terminated. (kg)

  19. 2025-10-24

    Local Rule CV-10(b) requires signature block to include mailing address, email address, signature, state bar card number, and telephone and fax numbers (including area code). The state bar card number is to be included in the signature block on all future filings. (kg)

  20. 2025-10-23

    Case assigned to Judge David Counts pursuant to the Order Assigning Business of the Court as it Relates to Patent Cases, filed 7/25/2022. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (kg)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-09-15