Jenam Tech, LLC v. Google LLC

Summary

Jenam Tech sued Google for patent infringement in federal court.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

35:0100

Entities in this case

Parties

Google LLC Jenam Tech, LLC

Docket entries

1. 2022-04-07

   Order

2. 2022-03-17

   1 - Terminate Deadlines and Hearings AND Motion Hearing

3. 2022-03-09

   ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings AND ~Util - Teleconference Zoom AND Clerk's Notice

4. 2022-03-09

   ~Util - Teleconference Zoom AND Clerk's Notice AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings

5. 2022-03-09

   ~Util - Teleconference Zoom AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings AND Clerk's Notice

6. 2022-01-07

   Clerk's Notice

7. 2021-10-26

   Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only

8. 2021-04-12

   Text Order GRANTING 80 Motion for Reconsideration entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Before the Court is Plaintiff Jenam Tech, LLCs Motion for Reconsideration. The Court notes that Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court's filing procedures regarding requests for leave to file. For this reason the Court struck Plaintiff's incorrectly filed Sur-Reply. See Text Order Denying ECF No. 70 on April 6, 2021. However, the Court notes that Plaintiff contacted the Court directly as soon as it became aware of its noncompliance and attempted to remedy the situation promptly. Plaintiff informed the Court that its noncompliance was due to a unintentional clerical error and Plaintiff assured the Court that it would not commit such an error again. When ruling on motions, some of the Court's main interests are justice and achieving the correct outcome based on all of the facts. Therefore, the Court will reconsider its ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply and Striking Plaintiff's Sur-Reply. However, the Court would like to make clear that such clerical errors do not excuse a party's failure to comply with Court procedure and should such an error occur in the future, the Court will not entertain reconsideration. After careful consideration of the Motion, Defendant's opposition, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS the Motion and the Court will reconsider Plaintiffs Motion for Leave (ECF 70). After reviewing Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Defendant's Motion to Transfer (ECF 26), the Court GRANTS the Motion for Leave (ECF 70). Plaintiff shall have up to and including April 14, 2021 to file its Sur-Reply. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

9. 2021-04-06

   Text Order DENYING 70 Motion for Leave to File entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Plaintiffs Opposed Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply filed on March 31, 2021. The Court notes that Plaintiff filed its Sur-Reply immediately after filing this Motion without leave of court. ECF No. 71. As such, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion and STRIKES its Sur-Reply and any subsequent filings referring to such. IT IS ORDERED that both parties refile any documents that refer to the contents of the stricken Sur-Reply within seven (7) days.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

10. 2021-03-30

    Text Order GRANTING 61 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Parties' Joint Motion. Noting that it is a Joint Motion, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including March 20, 2021 to respond. Defendant shall have up to and including March 29, 2021 to reply.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

11. 2021-03-10

    Text Order GRANTING 48 Motion to Stay Case entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Google's Motion to Stay pending resolution of its Motion to Transfer (ECF No. 48). The Court GRANTS this Motion. All deadlines will be stayed pending the Court's ruling on Google's Motion to Transfer.The Court notes that the Motion to Transfer was filed on March 12, 2020 and that the Parties had jointly extended these deadlines seven (7) times either by motion or through stipulation. The Court had previously granted each extension, at the Parties' request due to various complications, to allow the Parties to adequately respond to the motion. However, a year has now passed and the Court will no longer permit the Parties to once again stipulate to extend their deadlines. The Parties filed a Proposed Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 57) that once again extends the briefing deadlines for the Motion to Transfer. The Court declines to enter this scheduling order. As such, Jenam will have up to and including March 19, 2021 to Respond to the Motion to Transfer and Google will have up to and including March 26, 2021 to Reply. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

12. 2021-02-01

    Text Order GRANTING 51 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Parties' Joint Motion. Noting that it is a Joint Motion, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including February 8, 2021 to respond. Defendant shall have up to and including February 23, 2021 to reply. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

13. 2021-02-01

    Text Order GRANTING 50 Motion entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Parties' Joint Motion. Noting that it is a Joint Motion, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including February 16, 2021 to respond. Defendant shall have up to and including March 18, 2021 to reply.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

14. 2021-01-14

    Text Order GRANTING 47 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Parties' Joint Motion. Noting that it is a joint motion, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including January 22, 2021 to respond. Defendant shall have up to and including February 22, 2021 to reply.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

15. 2021-01-05

    Text Order GRANTING 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Parties' Joint Motion. Noting that it is a joint motion, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including January 8, 2021 to respond. Defendant shall have up to and including February 8, 2021 to reply. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

16. 2020-12-11

    Text Order GRANTING 45 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Defendant's Motion to Allow Brian Ferrall (Mr. Ferrall) to Withdraw As Counsel. Noting that it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the motion. It is therefore ORDERED that Mr. Ferrall is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record for Defendant. It is further ORDERED that the docket be amended to reflect that Mr. Ferrall has withdrawn as counsel for Defendant and that he no longer needs to be noticed of any pleadings, motions, or other documents filed or served in this case. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

17. 2020-12-10

    Text Order MOOTING 43 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Noting that the Court has ruled on Joint Motion to Reset Briefing Schedule for Googles Motion to Transfer (ECF No. 44), the Court MOOTS this Motion.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

18. 2020-12-10

    Text Order GRANTING 44 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Parties' Joint Motion. Noting that it is a joint motion, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 22, 2020 to respond. Defendant shall have up to and including January 21, 2021 to reply. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hs)

19. 2020-09-04

    Text Order GRANTING 36 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Came on for consideration is Plaintiff's Motion. Noting that it is unopposed, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including September 16, 2020 to respond/reply. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)

20. 2020-07-16

    Text Order GRANTING 19 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Judge Alan D Albright. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jy)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.