Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Charles Schwab Corporation
Summary
Parus Holdings is suing Charles Schwab, Capital One, Bank of America, and Fidelity over alleged patent infringement. The lawsuit concerns a patent related to financial services technology. The defendants are major financial institutions accused of using Parus's patented technology without authorization.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: defendant (2021-12-13)
Counsel of record
- McKool SmithCarra Rentie, Michael Edward Catapano
- McKool Smith, PC - DallasAlexandra Figari Easley, Casey Shomaker
- Tillotson Johnson & PattonKathryn Elizabeth Yukevich
- Jones Day - DallasKeith Bryan Davis
- Perkins Coie LLP - San DiegoKyle Ryan Canavera
- Spencer Fane LLPJeffrey M Ratinoff, Jing Hong Cherng, John V Picone , III
- Goodwin Procter, LLP - Washington DCAmanda E Stephenson, Jacqueline Genovese Bova
- Holland & Knight LLPDavid Curtis Schulte, Robert K. Jain
- Holland & Knight LLP - DallasAllia Victoria Monet Howard, Richard Lawrence Wynne , Jr
- McGuireWoods LLP - RichmondDavid E Finkelson
- Goodwin Proctor, LLP- BostonRobert Frederickson , III
- Spencer FaneJennifer S Coleman
- Wilson, Robertson & VanDeventer, P.C.Jennifer Parker Ainsworth
- Court
- TXED
- Docket no.
- 2:21-cv-00393
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- Rodney Gilstrap
- Filed
- 2021-10-22
- Last filing
- 2024-07-16
- Terminated
- 2024-08-20
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Parus Holdings, Inc. (plaintiff) Bank of America N.A. (defendant) Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (defendant) Charles Schwab Corporation (defendant) Capital One NA (consol defendant) David Keyzer (technical advisor) Capital One Bank (USA) National Association (consol defendant) FMR LLC d/b/a Fidelity Investments (consol defendant) Capital One Financial Corporation (consol defendant) Bank of America Corporation (consol defendant)
Docket entries
- 2024-01-24
Notice of Hearing
- 2023-02-23
Notice of Hearing
- 2022-10-11
Notice of Hearing on Motion
- 2022-09-14
Notice of Hearing
- 2022-08-17
Notice of Deficiency
- 2022-01-28
Notice of Deficiency
- 2022-01-18
Notice of Magistrate Availability
- 2022-01-13
Scheduling Conference
- 2021-12-22
Application Granted for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint
- 2021-12-21
Notice of Docket Correction
- 2021-12-14
Application Granted for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint
- 2021-12-14
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Bank of America Corporation to 12/31/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
- 2021-12-13
***FILED IN ERROR. FILE SECOND APPLICATION Document # 13, Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Bank of America Corporation. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, )
- 2021-12-13
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for FMR LLC d/b/a Fidelity Investments to 12/31/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
- 2021-12-13
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Charles Schwab Corporation to 12/31/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
- 2021-12-13
Notice of Docket Correction
- 2021-12-13
Application Granted for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint
- 2021-12-10
Notice of Docket Correction
- 2021-11-15
Application Granted for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint
- 2021-10-22
Notice of Magistrate Availability
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.