Holland & Knight

Counsel of record in 16 federal IP lawsuits tracked by IP Feed.

7 for plaintiffs7 for defendants
  1. Openfor plaintiffC.D. Cal.2026-10-05
    Cascade Drilling L.P. v. Regenesis Bioremediation Products Inc.

    Cascade Drilling sues Regenesis Bioremediation over patent rights in declaratory judgment action.

  2. Openfor plaintiffN.D. Cal.2026-10-02
    B.S.D Crown, Ltd. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    B.S.D Crown sues Amazon for patent infringement under federal patent law.

  3. Openfor defendantFLSD2026-09-30
    Conch & Coconut, LLC v. Conch & Coconut Limited

    Conch & Coconut LLC sues Conch & Coconut Limited and related parties for trademark infringement over the identical brand name.

  4. Openfor plaintiffTXED2026-09-24
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Microsoft Corporation

    MIT sues Microsoft for allegedly infringing patents in artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies.

  5. Openfor defendantTXED2026-09-23
    Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC

    Smart RF sues AT&T, Samsung, Nokia, Ericsson, Sprint, and T-Mobile for infringing wireless RF patents.

  6. Openfor plaintiffN.D. Cal.2026-07-14
    Cellular South Inc v. Google, LLC

    Cellular South sues Google for patent infringement in federal court.

  7. OpenILND2026-07-06
    Collectanea J. Limited v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

    Collectanea J. Limited sues multiple e-commerce platforms and sellers for copyright infringement.

  8. Openfor plaintiffN.D. Cal.2026-05-11
    CA, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc.

    CA Inc. sues Netflix for allegedly infringing patents licensed from VMware and Broadcom technology.

  9. Closedfor defendantTXED2025-04-03
    Touchpoint Projection Innovations, LLC v. Broadcom Inc.

    Touchpoint Projection Innovations sues Broadcom and Zscaler for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271.

  10. Openfor plaintiffN.D. Cal.2025-02-20
    Cellular South Inc v. Google, LLC

    Cellular South sues Google for allegedly infringing its patent technology in mobile services.

  11. ClosedTXED2024-07-16
    Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Charles Schwab Corporation

    Parus Holdings is suing Charles Schwab, Capital One, Bank of America, and Fidelity over alleged patent infringement. The lawsuit concerns a patent related to financial services technology. The defendants are major financial institutions accused of using Parus's patented technology without authorization.

  12. Openfor defendantC.D. Cal.2023-05-12
    Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. v. MaxLite, Inc.

    Obert, Inc. and Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. are suing MaxLite, Inc. for patent infringement. The lawsuit centers on lighting technology patents, though the specific patent numbers and technical details are not disclosed in the case record. The case is proceeding through federal court in California with mediation.

  13. Openfor defendantS.D.N.Y.2022-11-17
    Kuhmstedt v. The Village Voice, LLC

    Bernhard Kuhmstedt sues Village Voice for copyright infringement over allegedly stolen content.

  14. Closedfor plaintiffC.D. Cal.2017-01-12
    Elinor Shapiro v. Hasbro Inc

    Elinor Shapiro sues Hasbro for copyright infringement over an unspecified creative work or intellectual property.

  15. Closedfor defendantILND2014-06-02
    Select Retrieval, LLC v. ABT Electronics, Inc.

    Select Retrieval, LLC and three co-plaintiffs (Euromarket Designs, OfficeMax, and W.W. Grainger) sued 19 defendants including Hallmark.com, Motorola Mobility, Ace Hardware, and others for patent infringement. The lawsuit concerns a patented technology or method, but the specific patent number and innovation are not identified in the case record. The case was filed in the Northern District of Illinois.

  16. Closedfor defendantC.D. Cal.2003-05-28
    Century Payroll Inc v. Rapid Payroll Inc

    CBIZ Benefits & Insurance Services and Century Payroll are suing Paychex and Rapid Payroll for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The plaintiffs claim the defendants' use of confusingly similar marks in the payroll services space violates their trademark rights. The case centers on whether Rapid Payroll's branding infringes on Century Payroll's established mark.

Counsel sourced from public CourtListener docket records; firm names are normalized across spellings and office locations. Appearing for a party is not an endorsement of any position.