Cellular South Inc v. Google, LLC
Summary
Cellular South sues Google for patent infringement in federal court.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage: 4P · 1D · 20N
Latest ruling: defendant (2024-05-31)
Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the headlines behind the meter
4 plaintiff-favorable · 1 defendant-favorable · 20 neutral
- Google Pixel 7 Banned in Japan Over Patent DisputeTech Times · 2025-06-30
- Google smartphone 'Pixel 7' banned from sale in Japan, Korean manufacturer wins patent lawsuit and files lawsuit against Pixel 8 and Pixel 9GIGAZINE · 2025-06-28
- Google Pixel 7 series banned in Japan; Pixel 8 and 9 also at riskThe Times of India · 2025-06-28
- Google Pixel 7 sales banned in Japan, Pixel 8 and 9 might follow - GSMArena.com newsGSMArena.com · 2025-06-27
- Google persuades US appeals court to overturn $20 mln Nest patent verdictReuters · 2025-05-22
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Holland & Knight LLPAshley Lynn Shively, Morgan Delabar, Robert Kumar Jain +4 more
- Holland & KnightJacob W. S. Schneider
- Holland Knight LLPAnthony James Fuga
- The Dacus Firm, PCDeron R Dacus
- Watkins and Eager PLLCWalter T. Johnson
- Cooley LLPAlexandra Leeper, Andrew C. Mace, Dustin M. Knight +5 more
- Scott, Douglass & McConnico, LLPPaige Arnette Amstutz
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
- Docket no.
- 4:25-cv-01487
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
- Filed
- 2025-02-13
- Last filing
- 2026-07-14
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Docket entries
- 2026-07-10
No description on file
- 2026-03-27
No description on file
- 2026-01-28
No description on file
- 2025-08-13
No description on file
- 2025-07-02
No description on file
- 2025-06-26
No description on file
- 2025-05-01
No description on file
- 2025-03-12
No description on file
- 2025-02-28
No description on file
- 2025-02-26
No description on file
- 2025-02-24
No description on file
- 2025-02-21
No description on file
- 2025-02-20
No description on file
- 2025-02-20
No description on file
- 2025-02-20
No description on file
- 2024-10-18
NOTICE to filing attorneys Please do not file public exhibits to a sealed document until leave is granted for the sealed filing. In the event leave is denied at 45, 46 will be removed from the record. (lad)
- 2024-07-08
DEFICIENCY NOTICE: re 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Eamonn Gardner, and 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Matthew J. Brigham. Both filings were only partial documents. TO AVOID SECOND FILING FEES please file the full 3-5 page document for each atty as a "Supplement" to the respective Pro Hac motion.(lad)
- 2024-05-31
Text Order GRANTING [Dkt. # 7] Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Entered by Judge David A. Ezra. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sklc)
- 2024-05-31
Reset Deadlines: Google, LLC answer due 7/15/2024. (lad)
- 2024-05-09
Case randomly assigned to Judge David A. Ezra. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.