PatentTXED2:23-cv-00476

Aspen Networks, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.

Summary

Aspen Networks sues AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon for infringing its patents in wireless networking technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Coverage events: 1P · 0D · 0N (1 article)

Latest ruling: defendant (2023-10-24)

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

1 plaintiff-favorable · 0 defendant-favorable · 0 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant · 0 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable
Defendant-favorable

None classified yet.

Counsel of record

For the defendant
Other counsel (amici, etc.)
Court
TXED
Docket no.
2:23-cv-00476
Nature of suit
Patent
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder III
Filed
2023-10-10
Last filing
2026-08-24

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

T-Mobile USA, Inc. T-Mobile US, Inc. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Jane Du AT&T Mobility, LLC AT&T Inc. Aspen Networks, Inc.

Docket entries

  1. 2026-03-30

    No description on file

  2. 2026-03-24

    No description on file

  3. 2026-03-06

    No description on file

  4. 2026-01-27

    No description on file

  5. 2026-01-21

    No description on file

  6. 2025-04-17

    NOTICE of Hearing: Markman Hearing RESET for 4/29/2025 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (wea)

  7. 2025-04-17

    No description on file

  8. 2025-04-08

    NOTICE the Motion Hearing [Dkt. No. 82] set for 4/28/25 is CANCELLED. The Markman Hearing will go on as scheduled. (bga)

  9. 2025-03-24

    No description on file

  10. 2025-03-19

    No description on file

  11. 2025-03-12

    No description on file

  12. 2025-02-18

    NOTICE of Hearing:Markman Hearing RESET for 4/25/2025 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (bga)

  13. 2025-02-18

    No description on file

  14. 2024-04-03

    No description on file

  15. 2024-04-03

    Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Roy Payne: Scheduling Conference held on 4/3/24. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked if they consented to a trial before the magistrate judge. The parties were then given Markman and jury selection dates. The parties were directed to meet and confer regarding any changes to the Courts proposed docket control order and discovery order, and the parties are to submit the proposed orders within fourteen days. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Eric Findlay; Defense - Holly Engelmann, Jonathan Powers and Melissa Smith. (No exhibits)(Court Reporter Not Recorded.) (BGA)

  16. 2023-10-24

    No description on file

  17. 2023-10-24

    Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T Mobility, LLC to 12/18/2023; AT&T Inc. to 12/18/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )

  18. 2023-10-10

    No description on file

  19. 2023-10-10

    No description on file

  20. 2023-10-10

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-08-25