Baker & Hostetler
Counsel of record in 14 federal IP lawsuits tracked by IP Feed.
- Openfor defendantDED2026-10-22OnePass Data Technology LLC v. AT&T Services Inc.
OnePass Data Technology sues AT&T Services for patent infringement over data technology.
- Closedfor defendantTXED2026-10-22ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. v. AT&T Inc.
ASUS Technology Licensing sues AT&T and others for infringing wireless technology patents.
- Closedfor defendantTXND2026-10-05Marten Group Inc v. Tennant
Scott Tennant and Marten Group Inc are suing Curador LLC, Tennant Devices and Accessories LLC, and members of the Tennant family over trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The case involves a disputed trademark, likely related to devices or accessories given the defendant company's name. The lawsuit centers on whether the defendants' use of the mark infringes the plaintiffs' trademark rights.
- Closedfor plaintiffS.D.N.Y.2026-09-23MLB Advanced Media, L.P. v. Coles
Major League Baseball Properties and MLB Advanced Media are suing Terry Coles for trademark infringement. The lawsuit targets unauthorized use of MLB trademarks or branding. The case centers on protecting baseball's intellectual property rights in the commercial marketplace.
- Openfor plaintiffC.D. Cal.2026-09-02Artist Revenue Advocates, LLC v. Kanye Omari West
Artist Revenue Advocates sues Kanye West for copyright infringement related to music or content.
- Openfor defendantTXED2026-08-24Aspen Networks, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.
Aspen Networks sues AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon for infringing its patents in wireless networking technology.
- ClosedTXED2025-12-23Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc.
Pegasus Wireless sues Verizon and major carriers for infringing wireless technology patents.
- ClosedTXED2024-11-06Dynapass IP Holdings LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Dynapass IP Holdings is suing Amazon and multiple financial institutions—including Simmons Bank, First-Citizens Bank, Experian, East West Bank, and Charles Schwab Bank—for patent infringement. The lawsuit centers on a patent technology, likely related to digital payment or identity verification systems used in Amazon's services. The case involves claims that Amazon and the financial partners infringed Dynapass's patented technology without authorization.
- Openfor plaintiffILND2023-04-26Empire Today, LLC v. First Capital Asset Group, Inc.
Empire Today sues First Capital Asset Group and Robert Aydt for trademark infringement.
- Openfor defendantTXND2023-03-22Escapex IP LLC v. Spotify USA Inc
EscapeX IP sues Spotify for patent infringement over unspecified technology.
- Closedfor plaintiffTXED2022-05-16Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Google LLC
Uniloc 2017 LLC and Uniloc USA, Inc. are suing Google LLC for patent infringement in federal court. The case involves a patent dispute, though the specific patent number and technology at issue are not identified in the case record. The litigation includes intervention by the Public Interest Patent Law Institute and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
- Closedfor defendantC.D. Cal.2018-11-30L.A. Gem and Jewelry Design, Inc. v. Sears Holdings Management Corporation
L.A. Gem and Jewelry Design sued Sears Holdings and multiple jewelry companies for copyright infringement. The case involves the unauthorized copying of jewelry designs. The defendants include Sears retail operations and various jewelry manufacturers and dealers.
- Closedfor plaintiffILND2014-06-02Select Retrieval, LLC v. ABT Electronics, Inc.
Select Retrieval, LLC and three co-plaintiffs (Euromarket Designs, OfficeMax, and W.W. Grainger) sued 19 defendants including Hallmark.com, Motorola Mobility, Ace Hardware, and others for patent infringement. The lawsuit concerns a patented technology or method, but the specific patent number and innovation are not identified in the case record. The case was filed in the Northern District of Illinois.
- Closedfor plaintiffC.D. Cal.2003-05-28Century Payroll Inc v. Rapid Payroll Inc
CBIZ Benefits & Insurance Services and Century Payroll are suing Paychex and Rapid Payroll for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The plaintiffs claim the defendants' use of confusingly similar marks in the payroll services space violates their trademark rights. The case centers on whether Rapid Payroll's branding infringes on Century Payroll's established mark.
Counsel sourced from public CourtListener docket records; firm names are normalized across spellings and office locations. Appearing for a party is not an endorsement of any position.