Baker & Hostetler
Counsel of record in 10 federal IP lawsuits tracked by IP Feed.
- Closedfor defendantTXED2026-09-07ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. v. AT&T Inc.
ASUS Technology Licensing sues AT&T and others for infringing wireless technology patents.
- Openfor defendantDED2026-08-31OnePass Data Technology LLC v. AT&T Services Inc.
OnePass Data Technology sues AT&T Services for patent infringement over data technology.
- Openfor defendantTXED2026-08-24Aspen Networks, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.
Aspen Networks sues AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon for infringing its patents in wireless networking technology.
- Openfor plaintiffC.D. Cal.2026-08-19Artist Revenue Advocates, LLC v. Kanye Omari West
Artist Revenue Advocates sues Kanye West for copyright infringement related to music or content.
- Openfor plaintiffS.D.N.Y.2026-08-04MLB Advanced Media, L.P. v. Coles
MLB Advanced Media sues Coles for trademark infringement in federal court.
- ClosedTXED2025-12-23Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc.
Pegasus Wireless sues Verizon and major carriers for infringing wireless technology patents.
- ClosedTXED2024-11-06Dynapass IP Holdings LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Dynapass IP Holdings is suing Amazon and multiple financial institutions—including Simmons Bank, First-Citizens Bank, Experian, East West Bank, and Charles Schwab Bank—for patent infringement. The lawsuit centers on a patent technology, likely related to digital payment or identity verification systems used in Amazon's services. The case involves claims that Amazon and the financial partners infringed Dynapass's patented technology without authorization.
- Openfor plaintiffILND2023-04-26Empire Today, LLC v. First Capital Asset Group, Inc.
Empire Today sues First Capital Asset Group and Robert Aydt for trademark infringement.
- Openfor defendantTXND2023-03-22Escapex IP LLC v. Spotify USA Inc
EscapeX IP sues Spotify for patent infringement over unspecified technology.
- Closedfor plaintiffC.D. Cal.2003-05-28Century Payroll Inc v. Rapid Payroll Inc
Century Payroll is suing Rapid Payroll for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, alleging that Rapid Payroll's branding and name confuse customers into believing it's affiliated with or endorsed by Century Payroll. The case, filed in the Central District of California, involves competing payroll processing companies and centers on whether Rapid Payroll's use of similar marks dilutes or infringes Century Payroll's trademark rights.
Counsel sourced from public CourtListener docket records; firm names are normalized across spellings and office locations. Appearing for a party is not an endorsement of any position.