Is the press coverage of ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. v. AT&T Inc. aligned with the court record?

Coverage leans toward the defendant. No classified ruling yet to compare against the court record.

Patent TXED2:23-cv-00486Closed

ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. v. AT&T Inc.

Get an email if this closed case reopens or anything new is filed.

ASUS Technology Licensing sues AT&T and others for infringing wireless technology patents.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs realityPress: defendant

Prior 1P · 2D · 5N (10 articles)→Recent 30d 0P · 1D · 0N (2 articles)

Press coverage leans defendant-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

2 plaintiff-favorable · 5 defendant-favorable · 5 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 1 plaintiff · 3 defendant · 5 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable

Defendant-favorable

Telecom Giants Seek Fees For 'Unprincipled' Asus Patent SuitLaw360 · 2026-09-22
Telecom Giants Seek Fees For 'Unprincipled' Asus Patent SuitLaw360 · 2026-09-22
AT&T, Verizon Defeat ASUS Patent Claims Over Wireless NetworksBloomberg Law News · 2026-08-26
AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile Defeat Asus Patent Case In EDTXLaw360 · 2026-08-26

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff

Irell & Manella - Newport BeachStephen M Payne
Irell & Manella LLPRobert Zhu
Irell and ManellaCaroline Radell

For the defendant

McKool SmithArden Seavers, Clare Churchman, David C Kellam +1 more
Baker & Hostetler LLP - AtlantaLisa N. Collins
McKool Smith, PCSamuel Moore
McKool Smith, PC - AustinMatthew T. Cameron
McKool Smith, PC - HoustonBlake H Bailey
O'Melveny & Myers LLPJeffery Derek Baxter

Other counsel (amici, etc.)

MoloLamken LLPJared R Looper, Jeffrey A. Lamken, Jennifer Elizabeth Fischell +1 more
Sullivan & Cromwell LLPDustin Guzior, Robert J Giuffra , Jr
Gillam & Smith, LLPAndrew Thompson (Tom) Gorham
Independent counselAlexander N. Gross

Court: TXED
Docket no.: 2:23-cv-00486
Nature of suit: Patent
Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Filed: 2023-10-19
Last filing: 2026-10-22
Terminated: 2026-08-26

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

AT&T36 ASUS Technology Licensing3

Parties

Celerity IP, LLC (plaintiff) ASUS Technology Licensing Inc. (plaintiff) AT&T Services Inc. (defendant) AT&T Mobility II LLC (defendant) AT&T Mobility LLC (defendant) AT&T Corp. (defendant) AT&T Inc. (defendant) David Folsom (mediator) David Keyzer (technical advisor) Nokia of America Corporation (counter claimant) Ericsson Inc. (counter claimant) ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (counter defendant) Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (consol defendant) T-Mobile USA, Inc. (consol defendant) Innovative Sonic Limited (counter defendant)

Docket entries

2025-12-01
No description on file
2025-10-01
No description on file
2025-06-13
No description on file
2025-05-09
No description on file
2025-04-09
No description on file
2025-04-02
No description on file
2025-04-01
No description on file
2025-03-18
No description on file
2025-02-20
***FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document # 360, CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (NKL)
2024-10-24
No description on file
2024-10-01
No description on file
2024-08-27
No description on file
2024-06-20
No description on file
2024-06-17
No description on file
2024-05-28
No description on file
2024-01-22
No description on file
2023-12-27
No description on file
2023-10-24
No description on file
2023-10-19
No description on file
2023-10-19
No description on file

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on X LinkedIn

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-10-23

Summary

Coverage vs reality meter